On 03/28/2015 05:09 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 27/03/15 02:35, Kai Huang wrote:
This patch adds help functions to enable/disable PML, and flush PML buffer for
single vcpu and particular domain for further use.
Signed-off-by: Kai Huang
---
xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.c| 190 +
On 03/28/2015 04:48 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 27/03/15 02:35, Kai Huang wrote:
A new 4K page pointer is added to arch_vmx_struct as PML buffer for vcpu. And a
new 'status' field is added to vmx_domain to indicate whether PML is enabled for
the domain or not. The 'status' field also can be us
On 03/28/2015 04:46 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 27/03/15 02:35, Kai Huang wrote:
The patch adds PML definition and feature detection. Note PML won't be detected
if PML is disabled from boot parameter. PML is also disabled in construct_vmcs,
as it will only be enabled when domain is switched to
On 03/28/2015 04:42 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 27/03/15 02:35, Kai Huang wrote:
A top level EPT parameter "ept=" and a sub boolean "pml_enable" are
added to control PML. Other booleans can be further added for any other EPT
related features.
Signed-off-by: Kai Huang
Please patch docs/misc/
On 03/28/2015 04:38 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 27/03/15 02:35, Kai Huang wrote:
PML requires A/D bit support so enable it for further use.
Signed-off-by: Kai Huang
---
xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.c| 1 +
xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m-ept.c | 8 +++-
xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/
On 03/28/2015 05:26 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 27/03/15 02:35, Kai Huang wrote:
Hi all,
This patch series adds PML support to Xen. Please kindly help to review it.
Overall this looks like a very good series, and it is particularly
helpful given the level of commenting.
Which platforms is/w
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Berger [mailto:stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 9:45 PM
> To: Xu, Quan; Kevin O'Connor
> Cc: seab...@seabios.org; stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com;
> xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Daniel De Graaf; wei.l...@citrix.com
> Subject: Re:
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:andrew.coop...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 9:49 PM
> To: Wu, Feng; xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> Cc: Zhang, Yang Z; Tian, Kevin; k...@xen.org; jbeul...@suse.com
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 14/15] Suppress posting interru
On 2015/3/27 17:54, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2015-03-27 at 09:29 +0800, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
On 2015/3/26 18:06, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 08:53 +0800, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
Hrm, OK. I suppose we can live with autodetect and igd both meaning igd
and whoever adds a new type will
On 03/28/2015 08:44 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 04:32:45PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> El 26/03/15 a les 13.16, Bob Liu ha escrit:
>>> There are several place using gnttab async unmap and wait for
>>> completion, so move the common code to a function
>>> gnttab_
branch xen-unstable
xen branch xen-unstable
job test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit2
test guest-localmigrate
Tree: linux git://xenbits.xen.org/linux-pvops.git
Tree: linuxfirmware git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/linux-firmware.git
Tree: qemu git://xenbits.xen.org/staging/qemu-xen-unstable.git
Tree: qemuu git:
>>> Mark 03/27/15 7:38 PM >>>
>Are you saying that this isn't going to work by design?
No, all I'm saying is that this case hasn't been considered so far.
>I appreciate it's unusual to have the nested virtualisation.
Nested isn't unusual. What's unusual is that you want a device
surfaced to a 2
12 matches
Mail list logo
