Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 34/34] MAINTAINERS/xsplice: Add myself and Ross as the maintainers.

>>> On 15.03.16 at 18:56, wrote: > If you have a patch for xSplice send it our way! > > Signed-off-by: Ross Lagerwall > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > > --- > Cc: Ian Jackson > Cc:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 01/34] compat/x86: Remove unncessary #define.

>>> On 15.03.16 at 18:56, wrote: > It is not used. Consistently please - either keep them all (just to cover the case that they might get used) or remove them all: xen_compile_info, xen_changeset_info, etc are all unused too. Otoh xennmi_callback is used, but

Re: [Xen-devel] Frequent reports about Xen unstable hanging on ARM boots

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 06:37:43PM +, Julien Grall wrote: > (CC Chen for the omap port) > > Hi Lars, > > On 15/03/16 10:56, Lars Kurth wrote: > >Folks, > > > >I just noticed a cluster of issues related to Xen unstable hanging on > >various ARM boards. See > >* >

Re: [Xen-devel] [V4] x86/xsaves: fix overwriting between non-lazy/lazy xsaves

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 04:08:07AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 16.03.16 at 10:35, wrote: > > #define XSTATE_SUPER 0 > > Not an ideal name I would say. XSTATE_XSAVES_ONLY maybe? > Ok. > > #define using_xsaves 0 > > > > if ( using_xsaves && (v->arch.xcr0_accum

[Xen-devel] [linux-mingo-tip-master test] 86367: regressions - FAIL

flight 86367 linux-mingo-tip-master real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/86367/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-rumpuserxen6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 60684

[Xen-devel] [linux-4.1 test] 86330: regressions - FAIL

flight 86330 linux-4.1 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/86330/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-rumpuserxen 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 66399 build-i386-rumpuserxen

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 for Xen 4.7 1/4] xen: enable per-VCPU parameter settings for RTDS scheduler

>>> On 16.03.16 at 04:43, wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:32 PM, Chong Li wrote: >> If we define >> >>static bool warned; >> >> at the beginning of rt_dom_cntl(), do we need to initialize it? If without >> initialization, I think its default

Re: [Xen-devel] HVMlite gains

On 16/03/16 03:18, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Mar 15, 2016 3:05 PM, "Andrew Cooper" wrote: >> On 15/03/2016 21:52, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Andrew Cooper >>> wrote: On 15/03/2016 21:36, Andy Lutomirski

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/2] Make the pcidevs_lock a recursive one

>>> On 16.03.16 at 09:39, wrote: > On Wed, 2016-03-16 at 02:39 +, Xu, Quan wrote: >> __iiuc__, this patch set is ready for staging branch. if yes, could >> you help me merge it into staging branch? >> > Well, not yet, AFAICS. > > In fact, patch 1 touches

Re: [Xen-devel] [GRUB2 PATCH v4 4/4] multiboot2: Add support for relocatable images

On Tuesday, March 15, 2016, Daniel Kiper wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 05:30:20PM +0100, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko > wrote: > > On Tuesday, March 15, 2016, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko < > phco...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> +

Re: [Xen-devel] [GRUB2 PATCH v4 3/4 - FOR REVIEW ONLY] multiboot2: Do not pass memory maps to image if EFI boot services are enabled

On Wednesday, March 16, 2016, Toomas Soome wrote: > > > On 16. märts 2016, at 12:02, Daniel Kiper > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 07:46:46PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 04:26:00PM +0100, Daniel

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen PV block device support in Seabios

Hello On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:33:02AM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed there are some efforts to add Xen PV block device support in > Seabios in a GSoC project and there is a wiki page [1] for it. I found > some patches [2] to add Xenstore R/W support for Seabios. But I didn't >

Re: [Xen-devel] [GRUB2 PATCH v4 4/4] multiboot2: Add support for relocatable images

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 07:54:08PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:42:21PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 05:30:20PM +0100, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko > > wrote: > > > On Tuesday, March 15, 2016, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko > > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [GRUB2 PATCH v4 3/4 - FOR REVIEW ONLY] multiboot2: Do not pass memory maps to image if EFI boot services are enabled

> On 16. märts 2016, at 12:02, Daniel Kiper wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 07:46:46PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 04:26:00PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote: >>> Do not pass memory maps to image if it asked for EFI boot services. >> >>

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 07/34] arm/x86: Use struct virtual_region to do bug, symbol, and (x86) exception tables

>>> On 15.03.16 at 21:02, wrote: > On 15/03/16 19:51, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> On 15/03/16 19:34, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 07:24:30PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote: On 15/03/16 17:56, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > diff --git

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v9]xen: sched: convert RTDS from time to event driven model

On Tue, 2016-03-15 at 23:40 -0400, Meng Xu wrote: > > > > @@ -115,6 +118,18 @@ > > > >   #define RTDS_delayed_runq_add (1<<__RTDS_delayed_runq_add) > > > > > > > >   /* > > > > + * The replenishment timer handler needs to check this bit > > > > + * to know where a replenished vcpu was, when

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1 1/1] xen/arm: Re-add the Xilinx ZynqMP platform

>>> On 15.03.16 at 18:47, wrote: > Hi Jan and Ian, > > This patch has been acked by Stefano and not in the tree. > > I'm not sure who is in charge to commit ARM related patches in the tree > so I've CCed both of you. Indeed right now the process is to prod the committers

Re: [Xen-devel] [V4] x86/xsaves: fix overwriting between non-lazy/lazy xsaves

>>> On 16.03.16 at 10:35, wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 07:33:40AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> On 15.03.16 at 10:40, wrote: >> >xrstor() will look as follow: >> >if ( using_xsaves ) >> >{ >> >if (

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 21/22] xen/arm: Add a hypercall for device mmio mapping

>>> On 16.03.16 at 10:48, wrote: > On 2016/3/4 18:29, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> > --- a/xen/arch/arm/mm.c >>> > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/mm.c >>> > @@ -1138,6 +1138,9 @@ int xenmem_add_to_physmap_one( >>> > rcu_unlock_domain(od); >>> > break; >>> > } >>> >

Re: [Xen-devel] [GRUB2 PATCH v4 3/4 - FOR REVIEW ONLY] multiboot2: Do not pass memory maps to image if EFI boot services are enabled

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 07:46:46PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 04:26:00PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote: > > Do not pass memory maps to image if it asked for EFI boot services. > > .. I would change this sentence a bit. > > If image requested EFI boot services then

Re: [Xen-devel] XSA-155 and XSA-157 fixes missing from some stable Linux trees

>>> On 16.03.16 at 10:35, wrote: > On 03/16/2016, 10:25 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> Hello, >> >> it's been puzzling me for a while that these fixes, despite having the >> necessary Cc, did not make it into (at least) 4.1.y and 3.12.y yet. >> Unless there's a specific reason, may I

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 01/28] xen/x86: Drop unused and non-useful feature definitions

On 16/03/16 07:53, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 03:34:57PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> None of these features are interesting for Xen to use, or to be advertised to >> guests. Doing so identifies further areas of code which can be removed now >> that 32bit support has

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 21/22] xen/arm: Add a hypercall for device mmio mapping

On 2016/3/4 18:29, Jan Beulich wrote: >> > --- a/xen/arch/arm/mm.c >> > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/mm.c >> > @@ -1138,6 +1138,9 @@ int xenmem_add_to_physmap_one( >> > rcu_unlock_domain(od); >> > break; >> > } >> > +case XENMAPSPACE_dev_mmio: >> > +rc =

Re: [Xen-devel] [V4] x86/xsaves: fix overwriting between non-lazy/lazy xsaves

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 07:33:40AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 15.03.16 at 10:40, wrote: > > xrstor() will look as follow: > > if ( using_xsaves ) > > { > > if ( unlikely(!(prt->xsave_hdr->xcom_bv & > >

Re: [Xen-devel] XSA-155 and XSA-157 fixes missing from some stable Linux trees

On 03/16/2016, 10:25 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: > Hello, > > it's been puzzling me for a while that these fixes, despite having the > necessary Cc, did not make it into (at least) 4.1.y and 3.12.y yet. > Unless there's a specific reason, may I ask for inclusion of > > CVE-2015-8550 / XSA-155: > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 05/14] libxl: Load guest BIOS from file

On Tue, 2016-03-15 at 20:53 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 05:55:40PM +, Anthony PERARD wrote: > > > > --- a/docs/man/xl.cfg.pod.5 > > +++ b/docs/man/xl.cfg.pod.5 > > @@ -1121,6 +1121,15 @@ Requires device_model_version=qemu-xen. > >   > >  =back > >   > >

[Xen-devel] XSA-155 and XSA-157 fixes missing from some stable Linux trees

Hello, it's been puzzling me for a while that these fixes, despite having the necessary Cc, did not make it into (at least) 4.1.y and 3.12.y yet. Unless there's a specific reason, may I ask for inclusion of CVE-2015-8550 / XSA-155: 454d5d882c xen: Add RING_COPY_REQUEST() 0f589967a7 xen-netback:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V3] libxc: Have xc_translate_foreign_address() set errno properly

On 03/16/2016 11:00 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:20:02AM +0200, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: >> On 03/03/2016 03:58 PM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: >>> Currently it's possible for xc_translate_foreign_address() to fail >>> and errno still be set to success. This patch fixes

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 12/22] arm/acpi: Prepare EFI memory descriptor for Dom0

On 2016/3/4 19:13, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Fri, 4 Mar 2016, Shannon Zhao wrote: >> > From: Shannon Zhao >> > >> > Create a few EFI memory descriptors to tell Dom0 the RAM region >> > information, ACPI table regions and EFI tables reserved resions. >> > >> >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V3] libxc: Have xc_translate_foreign_address() set errno properly

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:20:02AM +0200, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: > On 03/03/2016 03:58 PM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: > > Currently it's possible for xc_translate_foreign_address() to fail > > and errno still be set to success. This patch fixes the issue. > > Based on the first half of Don Slutz'

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 04/14] firmware/makefile: install BIOS blob ...

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 09:54:44AM +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On Tue, 2016-03-15 at 20:26 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 05:55:39PM +, Anthony PERARD wrote: > > >  > > > diff --git a/tools/firmware/Makefile b/tools/firmware/Makefile > > > index

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] tmem: allow tmem to be disabled with Kconfig

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 02:39:02AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 16.03.16 at 08:35, wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 03:18:50PM -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote: > >> Wrap the various tmem functions with the Kconfig generated CONFIG_TMEM > >> option allowing users to

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 04/14] firmware/makefile: install BIOS blob ...

On Tue, 2016-03-15 at 20:26 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 05:55:39PM +, Anthony PERARD wrote: > >  > > diff --git a/tools/firmware/Makefile b/tools/firmware/Makefile > > index 6cc86ce..6a37758 100644 > > --- a/tools/firmware/Makefile > > +++

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 05/28] xen/x86: Collect more cpuid feature leaves

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 03:35:01PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote: > New words are: > * 0x8007.edx - Contains Invarient TSC > * 0x8008.ebx - Newly used for AMD Zen processors > > In addition, replace some open-coded ITSC and EFRO manipulation. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] tmem: allow tmem to be disabled with Kconfig

>>> On 15.03.16 at 21:18, wrote: > Wrap the various tmem functions with the Kconfig generated CONFIG_TMEM > option allowing users to build Xen without tmem support. > > Signed-off-by: Doug Goldstein > --- > CC: Keir Fraser > CC: Jan Beulich

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] tmem: drop direct usage of opt_tmem

>>> On 15.03.16 at 21:18, wrote: > Don't use the opt_tmem variable to check if tmem is enabled, instead use > the tmem_enabled() helper function everywhere. > > Signed-off-by: Doug Goldstein > --- > CC: Keir Fraser > CC: Jan Beulich

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 04/28] xen/x86: Script to automatically process featureset information

> + > +def format_uint32s(words, indent): > +""" Format a list of uint32_t's sutable for a macro definition """ s/sutable/suitable/ > +spaces = " " * indent > +return spaces + (", \\\n" + spaces).join(words) + ", \\" > + > + ___ Xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] tmem: allow tmem to be disabled with Kconfig

>>> On 16.03.16 at 08:35, wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 03:18:50PM -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote: >> Wrap the various tmem functions with the Kconfig generated CONFIG_TMEM >> option allowing users to build Xen without tmem support. > > I ended with this change on top of

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/2] Make the pcidevs_lock a recursive one

On Wed, 2016-03-16 at 02:39 +, Xu, Quan wrote: > Hi, >   __iiuc__, this patch set is ready for staging branch. if yes, could > you help me merge it into staging branch? > Well, not yet, AFAICS. In fact, patch 1 touches xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/ and, unless I've missed it, I haven't seen

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/5] tmem: allow tmem to be disabled with Kconfig

>>> On 15.03.16 at 20:04, wrote: > On 3/15/16 3:31 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 14.03.16 at 21:29, wrote: >>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c >>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c >>> @@ -5311,6 +5311,10 @@ typedef unsigned long hvm_hypercall_t( >>> #define

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 03/28] xen/public: Export cpu featureset information in the public API

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 03:34:59PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote: > For the featureset to be a useful object, it needs a stable interpretation, a > property which is missing from the current hw_caps interface. > > Additionly, introduce TSC_ADJUST, FDP_EXCP_ONLY, SHA, PREFETCHWT1, ITSC, EFRO > and

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 06/14] xen: Move the hvm_start_info C representation from libxc to public/xen.h

>>> On 16.03.16 at 01:59, wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 02:09:46AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> On 14.03.16 at 18:55, wrote: >> > --- a/xen/include/public/xen.h >> > +++ b/xen/include/public/xen.h >> > @@ -841,6 +841,37 @@ typedef struct

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 for Xen 4.7 1/4] xen: enable per-VCPU parameter settings for RTDS scheduler

On Tue, 2016-03-15 at 23:43 -0400, Meng Xu wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:32 PM, Chong Li > wrote: > > > > How about: > > > > > > > > We create a global variable in sched_rt.c: > > > > /* This variable holds its value through hyerpcall re- > > > > issueing. > > > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V3] libxc: Have xc_translate_foreign_address() set errno properly

On 03/03/2016 03:58 PM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: > Currently it's possible for xc_translate_foreign_address() to fail > and errno still be set to success. This patch fixes the issue. > Based on the first half of Don Slutz' patch: > http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-03/msg03720.html >

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 3.4 056/107] x86/ldt: Make modify_ldt synchronous

From: Andy Lutomirski 3.4.111-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- commit 37868fe113ff2ba814b3b4eb12df214df555f8dc upstream. modify_ldt() has questionable locking and does not synchronize threads. Improve it: redesign the

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 3.4 055/107] x86/xen: Probe target addresses in set_aliased_prot() before the hypercall

From: Andy Lutomirski 3.4.111-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- commit aa1acff356bbedfd03b544051f5b371746735d89 upstream. The update_va_mapping hypercall can fail if the VA isn't present in the guest's page tables. Under

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 02/28] xen/x86: Rename features to be closer to the vendor definitions

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 03:34:58PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote: > These features are soon to be exposed in the Xen public API. Rename them to > better match the vendor definitions. > At the same time they won't match with Linux definitions - which is convient to lookup what those flags do.

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 01/28] xen/x86: Drop unused and non-useful feature definitions

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 03:34:57PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote: > None of these features are interesting for Xen to use, or to be advertised to > guests. Doing so identifies further areas of code which can be removed now > that 32bit support has been dropped. > > IA64 has a sole user in

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] tmem: allow tmem to be disabled with Kconfig

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 03:18:50PM -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote: > Wrap the various tmem functions with the Kconfig generated CONFIG_TMEM > option allowing users to build Xen without tmem support. I ended with this change on top of yours (which I will squash): The 'bool "tmem" so that if I did

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH] blkif.h: document scsi/0x12/0x83 node

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:09:05AM +0800, Bob Liu wrote: > Sometimes, we need to query VPD page=0x83 data from underlying storage so > that vendor supplied software can run inside the VM and believe it's talking > to > the vendor's own storage. > But different vendors may have different special

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 86315: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

flight 86315 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/86315/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): build-amd64-rumpuserxen 6 xen-buildfail like 86183 build-i386-rumpuserxen

Re: [Xen-devel] Patching error while setting up COLO

Hi Changlong, Thanks for the reply, the script works now. Now I have a question about the network setup: according to the website you sent me, colo network interfaces between two servers should be set up like the following? is