Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v13 1/3] IOMMU/x86: use a struct pci_dev* instead of SBDF

On July 04, 2016 1:35 PM, Tian, Kevin wrote: > > From: Xu, Quan > > Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 2:00 PM > > > > From: Quan Xu > > > > A struct pci_dev* instead of SBDF is stored inside struct pci_ats_dev > > and parameter to *_ats_device(). > > > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v13 2/3] IOMMU: add domain crash logic

> From: Xu, Quan > Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 2:00 PM > > From: Quan Xu > > Add domain crash logic to the generic IOMMU layer to benefit > all platforms. > > No spamming of the log can occur. For DomU, we avoid logging any > message for already dying domains. For Dom0,

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v13 1/3] IOMMU/x86: use a struct pci_dev* instead of SBDF

> From: Xu, Quan > Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 2:00 PM > > From: Quan Xu > > A struct pci_dev* instead of SBDF is stored inside struct > pci_ats_dev and parameter to *_ats_device(). > > Also use ats_dev for "struct pci_ats_dev" variable, while > pdev (_pdev, if there is

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mini-os: replace lib/printf.c with a version not under GPL

On 03/07/16 20:35, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > Juergen Gross, on Fri 01 Jul 2016 11:33:27 +0200, wrote: >> Instead of a Linux kernel based implementation use one from freeBSD. > > That'd be useful indeed :) > >> I'm not sure about coding style here: should I keep (more or less) the >>

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 96580: regressions - FAIL

flight 96580 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/96580/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 94856

[Xen-devel] [linux-3.14 baseline-only test] 66493: regressions - FAIL

This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 66493 linux-3.14 real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/66493/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 6

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 96605: regressions - FAIL

flight 96605 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/96605/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 17 guest-start/debianhvm.repeat fail REGR. vs. 94748

Re: [Xen-devel] Question about unable to add disk device after VM is destroyed and recreated on NVIDIA Jetson board

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Meng Xu wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm running Xen on NVIDIA Jetson TK1 board. The Xen code is from Ian's > repo.: git://xenbits.xen.org/people/ianc/xen.git with the commit point > c78d51660446d33dac4bb07c3c17e1d14d62ebc2 > > Right now, I can

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 96588: regressions - FAIL

flight 96588 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/96588/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 17 guest-start/debianhvm.repeat fail REGR. vs. 94748

Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.1 baseline-only test] 66490: trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

Hi, On 03/07/2016 09:09, Platform Team regression test user wrote: This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 66490 linux-4.1 real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/66490/ This link does not work outside of Citrix network. So is there any value to

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mini-os: replace lib/printf.c with a version not under GPL

Hello, Juergen Gross, on Fri 01 Jul 2016 11:33:27 +0200, wrote: > Instead of a Linux kernel based implementation use one from freeBSD. That'd be useful indeed :) > I'm not sure about coding style here: should I keep (more or less) the > one from freeBSD, or is the Xen style preferred? I'd say

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mini-os: make cscope repair

Juergen Gross, on Fri 01 Jul 2016 11:33:11 +0200, wrote: > "make cscope" doesn't like symbolic link include/mini-os->. as it > leads to a file system recursion. Repair that by not following links > when searching the sources. > > Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross Acked-by: Samuel

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 96561: regressions - FAIL

flight 96561 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/96561/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 17 guest-start/debianhvm.repeat fail REGR. vs. 94748

[Xen-devel] [seabios baseline-only test] 66495: regressions - FAIL

This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 66495 seabios real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/66495/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-intel 16

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 96558: tolerable FAIL

flight 96558 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/96558/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale 16 guest-start.2 fail pass in 96515 test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 15

[Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-4.6-testing baseline-only test] 66491: regressions - trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 66491 qemu-upstream-4.6-testing real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/66491/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-armhf 4

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 96557: regressions - FAIL

flight 96557 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/96557/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 94856

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-coverity test] 96571: all pass - PUSHED

flight 96571 xen-unstable-coverity real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/96571/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed version targeted for testing: xen bb4f41b3dff831faaf5a3248e0ecd123024d7f8f baseline version: xen

[Xen-devel] [linux-4.1 baseline-only test] 66490: trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 66490 linux-4.1 real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/66490/ Failures and problems with tests :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-armhf-xsm