[Xen-devel] [ovmf baseline-only test] 68262: tolerable FAIL

2016-12-23 Thread Platform Team regression test user
This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 68262 ovmf real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68262/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 9 debian-hvm-install f

[Xen-devel] [distros-debian-jessie test] 68263: regressions - FAIL

2016-12-23 Thread Platform Team regression test user
flight 68263 distros-debian-jessie real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68263/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-armhf-jessie-netboot-pygrub 14 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. v

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 14/14] xen/x86: setup PVHv2 Dom0 ACPI tables

2016-12-23 Thread Roger Pau Monne
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 01:19:36PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > On 12/22/2016 11:44 AM, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 09:24:02AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > > On 22.12.16 at 17:17, wrote: > >>> On 12/22/2016 07:17 AM, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > Maybe Boris has some i

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 5/5] tools/blktap2/drivers: Remove non-existent sys/sysctl.h include

2016-12-23 Thread Wei Liu
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 07:44:19AM -0800, Alistair Francis wrote: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:54 AM, Wei Liu wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 11:47:00AM -0800, Alistair Francis wrote: > >> To avoid build errors related to missing file 'sys/sysctl.h' by removing > >> the #include statement. > >>

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 103803: regressions - FAIL

2016-12-23 Thread osstest service owner
flight 103803 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103803/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 103466

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl/libxl_qmp.c: Fix code style in qmp_next()

2016-12-23 Thread Wei Liu
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 11:16:58AM +0800, Zhang Chen wrote: [...] > >>+ > >Here, as I understand it, read can return incomplete message. For > >example, when the buffer is not big enough. > > > >And the inner loop in original code handles that by checking if there is > >"\r\n". If not, it will read

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] build: move setting LTO options to xen/Rules.mk

2016-12-23 Thread Wei Liu
Having them in StdGNU.mk would affect both hypervisor and tools build. However judging from the commit message of e4cdd74f LTO was only meant to affect hypvervisor build. Move the relevant bits to xen/Rules.mk. Signed-off-by: Wei Liu --- Cc: Andrew Cooper Cc: George Dunlap Cc: Ian Jackson Cc:

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] build: minor adjustment

2016-12-23 Thread Wei Liu
Wei Liu (2): build: move debug{,_symbols} to tools/Rules.mk build: use debug_symbols to add -g3 Config.mk | 9 - tools/Rules.mk | 10 +- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) -- 2.1.4 ___ Xen-devel mailing list

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] build: move debug{, _symbols} to tools/Rules.mk

2016-12-23 Thread Wei Liu
31d41d7b tried to make debug affect tools build only but failed to take care of debug_symbols (which appends "-g" to CFLAGS). Move both to tools/Rules.mk at once in this patch. Signed-off-by: Wei Liu --- Cc: Andrew Cooper Cc: George Dunlap Cc: Ian Jackson Cc: Jan Beulich Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] build: use debug_symbols to add -g3

2016-12-23 Thread Wei Liu
While doing archeology I found 38ce7ce3, we should also make sure debug_symbols is the responsible for adding "-g" to CFLAGS. Move adding "-g3" from being guarded by debug to being guarded by debug_symbols. Signed-off-by: Wei Liu --- Cc: Andrew Cooper Cc: George Dunlap Cc: Ian Jackson Cc: Ja

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4] x86/apicv: fix RTC periodic timer and apicv issue

2016-12-23 Thread Xuquan (Quan Xu)
On December 22, 2016 4:12 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: On 21.12.16 at 06:44, wrote: >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/intr.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/intr.c >> @@ -315,9 +315,13 @@ void vmx_intr_assist(void) >> * Set eoi_exit_bitmap for periodic timer interrup to cause >EOI-induced VM >>

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] build: move setting LTO options to xen/Rules.mk

2016-12-23 Thread Wei Liu
Having them in StdGNU.mk would affect both hypervisor and tools build. However judging from the commit message of e4cdd74f LTO was only meant to affect hypvervisor build. Move the relevant bits to xen/Rules.mk. Signed-off-by: Wei Liu --- Cc: Andrew Cooper Cc: George Dunlap Cc: Ian Jackson Cc:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] build: move setting LTO options to xen/Rules.mk

2016-12-23 Thread Wei Liu
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 12:24:17PM +, Wei Liu wrote: > Having them in StdGNU.mk would affect both hypervisor and tools build. > However judging from the commit message of e4cdd74f LTO was only meant > to affect hypvervisor build. > > Move the relevant bits to xen/Rules.mk. > Ah, git send-ema

[Xen-devel] How to find device name in order to fill STAO ACPI table

2016-12-23 Thread Roger Pau Monné
Hello, I've been looking into the STAO specification[0], because I think it would also be useful for x86 PVHv2 Dom0, but I'm not really sure how is Xen supposed to use it. Xen doesn't have an AML parser, so I'm not sure how is it supposed to guess the name of the devices it wants to hide from Dom

Re: [Xen-devel] Bug report

2016-12-23 Thread Wei Liu
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 05:07:58PM -0300, Ing. Ricardo Brisighelli wrote: > Hi my name is Richard and i suscribe to this list but dont know if this list > is for reports bugs. > Yes. Please read https://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Reporting_Bugs_against_Xen Wei. > Tnks > > __

[Xen-devel] Stale Xenstore entries after start of domU with stubdom

2016-12-23 Thread Juergen Gross
Anyone an idea why I have additional stale Xenstore entries each time I've started a new domU with a stubdom? After 4 such starts I have: vm = "" -0100--fd7f-489bdb5a = "" memory = "6651" -0100--fc7f-48dbe98a = "" memory = "6651" -0100--ff7f-4

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.8-testing test] 103807: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2016-12-23 Thread osstest service owner
flight 103807 xen-4.8-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103807/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 16 guest-stopfail like 103767 test-amd64-amd64-xl-rtds

[Xen-devel] [BUG]: [PATCH added] Incorrect queue counters in netback interface

2016-12-23 Thread Mart van Santen
Hello Xen Devel, We encountered an issue with one of our instances pushing a lot of (network) data, resulting in incorrect bandwidth reporting. We do poll interface traffic every 5 minutes for every interface of our instances (from Dom0) and store those values for reporting/graphing. At some poin

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-smoke test] 103842: tolerable all pass - PUSHED

2016-12-23 Thread osstest service owner
flight 103842 xen-unstable-smoke real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103842/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 12 migrate-support-checkfail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl 1

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.7-testing test] 103802: regressions - FAIL

2016-12-23 Thread osstest service owner
flight 103802 xen-4.7-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103802/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 16 guest-start.2 fail in 103790 REGR. vs. 103769 Tests which are

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 14/14] xen/x86: setup PVHv2 Dom0 ACPI tables

2016-12-23 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 12/23/2016 05:27 AM, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 01:19:36PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >> On 12/22/2016 11:44 AM, Roger Pau Monne wrote: >>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 09:24:02AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> On 22.12.16 at 17:17, wrote: > On 12/22/2016 07:17 AM, Ro

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 14/14] xen/x86: setup PVHv2 Dom0 ACPI tables

2016-12-23 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 10:27:46AM +, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 01:19:36PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > > On 12/22/2016 11:44 AM, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 09:24:02AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > On 22.12.16 at 17:17, wrote: > > >>> O

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 14/14] xen/x86: setup PVHv2 Dom0 ACPI tables

2016-12-23 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> But this still assumes that dom0 handles ACPI event for a pCPUs as well, > right? And I am not sure this can work. > > Actually, how do we hotplug pCPUs now? xen-hptool ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-deve

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 14/14] xen/x86: setup PVHv2 Dom0 ACPI tables

2016-12-23 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 12/23/2016 10:31 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >> But this still assumes that dom0 handles ACPI event for a pCPUs as well, >> right? And I am not sure this can work. >> >> Actually, how do we hotplug pCPUs now? > xen-hptool Yes, but this has nothing to do with an actual pCPU being hot-plugge

[Xen-devel] [linux-3.18 test] 103800: regressions - FAIL

2016-12-23 Thread osstest service owner
flight 103800 linux-3.18 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103800/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 6 xen-bootfail REGR. vs. 101675 test-amd64-amd64-xl-

Re: [Xen-devel] [BUG]: [PATCH added] Incorrect queue counters in netback interface

2016-12-23 Thread Juergen Gross
On 23/12/16 15:24, Mart van Santen wrote: > Hello Xen Devel, > > We encountered an issue with one of our instances pushing a lot of > (network) data, resulting in incorrect bandwidth reporting. We do poll > interface traffic every 5 minutes for every interface of our instances > (from Dom0) and st

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 14/14] xen/x86: setup PVHv2 Dom0 ACPI tables

2016-12-23 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 10:35:10AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > On 12/23/2016 10:31 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > >> But this still assumes that dom0 handles ACPI event for a pCPUs as well, > >> right? And I am not sure this can work. > >> > >> Actually, how do we hotplug pCPUs now? > > xen

[Xen-devel] [xl restore and migrating problem - hardware compatibility]

2016-12-23 Thread Ing. Ricardo Brisighelli
Hi, i'm gentoo user and try with xen 4.6.3 and 4.7.1 in both version have the same problem. My cpu is AMD A10-7860K I run VM as PVlinux, then try migrate to other server (same hardware) and dont work, same occurs when try restore a saved VM, but this works well (migrate and restore) if run VM

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.5-testing test] 103805: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2016-12-23 Thread osstest service owner
flight 103805 xen-4.5-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103805/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-migrupgrade 3 host-install/src_host(3) broken in 103791 pass in 103805 test-amd64-amd64-li

Re: [Xen-devel] [xl restore and migrating problem - hardware compatibility]

2016-12-23 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 23/12/16 16:32, Ing. Ricardo Brisighelli wrote: Hi, i'm gentoo user and try with xen 4.6.3 and 4.7.1 in both version have the same problem. My cpu is AMD A10-7860K This issue has been reported before ("[Xen-devel] "X86_PV_VCPU_MSRS record truncated" during domain restore"). I submitted p

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 14/14] xen/x86: setup PVHv2 Dom0 ACPI tables

2016-12-23 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 12/23/2016 11:02 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 10:35:10AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >> On 12/23/2016 10:31 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: But this still assumes that dom0 handles ACPI event for a pCPUs as well, right? And I am not sure this can work.

[Xen-devel] ACPI suspend/resume not failing with (dom0) kernel panic

2016-12-23 Thread Dario Faggioli
Hey, I was trying ACPI suspend/resume for testing some patches to Xen, on a box on which I'm 100% sure I've seen it working a few time back. Right now, suspending seems ok, but upon resuming, this is what I see (and after that, everything is just locked): [ 132.790494] smpboot: CPU 15 is now of

Re: [Xen-devel] [xl restore and migrating problem - hardware compatibility]

2016-12-23 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 23/12/16 17:00, Andrew Cooper wrote: On 23/12/16 16:32, Ing. Ricardo Brisighelli wrote: Hi, i'm gentoo user and try with xen 4.6.3 and 4.7.1 in both version have the same problem. My cpu is AMD A10-7860K This issue has been reported before ("[Xen-devel] "X86_PV_VCPU_MSRS record truncated

Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI suspend/resume not failing with (dom0) kernel panic

2016-12-23 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 12/23/2016 12:16 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > Hey, > > I was trying ACPI suspend/resume for testing some patches to Xen, on a > box on which I'm 100% sure I've seen it working a few time back. > > Right now, suspending seems ok, but upon resuming, this is what I see > (and after that, everything

Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI suspend/resume not failing with (dom0) kernel panic

2016-12-23 Thread Dario Faggioli
On Fri, 2016-12-23 at 12:34 -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > On 12/23/2016 12:16 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > [  132.790494] smpboot: CPU 15 is now offline > > [  132.797383] ACPI: Low-level resume complete > > [  132.801635] PM: Restoring platform NVS memory > > [  142.805036] Kernel panic - not s

[Xen-devel] PROBLEM: Kernel BUG with raid5 soft + Xen + DRBD - invalid opcode

2016-12-23 Thread MasterPrenium
Hello Guys, I've having some trouble on a new system I'm setting up. I'm getting a kernel BUG message, seems to be related with the use of Xen (when I boot the system _without_ Xen, I don't get any crash). Here is configuration : - 3x Hard Drives running on RAID 5 Software raid created by mdadm

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.4-testing test] 103812: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2016-12-23 Thread osstest service owner
flight 103812 xen-4.4-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103812/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 15 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail in 103796 pass in 103812 test-amd64-i386-

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 103818: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2016-12-23 Thread osstest service owner
flight 103818 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103818/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-qcow2 12 saverestore-support-check fail like 103797 test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-w

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 5/5] tools/blktap2/drivers: Removenon-existent sys/sysctl.h include

2016-12-23 Thread alistair23
Hey Wei, Sorry about the top post but I’m doing this from my phone. That sounds good to me, you can use that commit message. Thanks, Alistair From: Wei Liu Sent: Friday, 23 December 2016 6:12 AM To: Alistair Francis Cc: Wei Liu; Doug Goldstein; ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com; imhy.y...@gmail.com;

Re: [Xen-devel] [xl restore and migrating problem - hardware compatibility]

2016-12-23 Thread Ing. Ricardo Brisighelli
El Vie 23 Dic 2016 17:16:32 Andrew Cooper escribió: > On 23/12/16 17:00, Andrew Cooper wrote: > > On 23/12/16 16:32, Ing. Ricardo Brisighelli wrote: > >> Hi, i'm gentoo user and try with xen 4.6.3 and 4.7.1 in both version > >> have the > >> same problem. > >> > >> My cpu is AMD A10-7860K > > > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [xl restore and migrating problem - hardware compatibility]

2016-12-23 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 23/12/16 22:56, Ing. Ricardo Brisighelli wrote: El Vie 23 Dic 2016 17:16:32 Andrew Cooper escribió: On 23/12/16 17:00, Andrew Cooper wrote: On 23/12/16 16:32, Ing. Ricardo Brisighelli wrote: Hi, i'm gentoo user and try with xen 4.6.3 and 4.7.1 in both version have the same problem. My cpu

[Xen-devel] [libvirt test] 103827: tolerable all pass - PUSHED

2016-12-23 Thread osstest service owner
flight 103827 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103827/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 13 saverestore-support-checkfail like 103479 test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-qcow2 1

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.5-testing baseline-only test] 68264: regressions - FAIL

2016-12-23 Thread Platform Team regression test user
This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 68264 xen-4.5-testing real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68264/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-i386-pvgrub 6 xen-boot

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 103840: regressions - FAIL

2016-12-23 Thread osstest service owner
flight 103840 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103840/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw 9 debian-di-installfail REGR. vs. 103394 Regressions which

[Xen-devel] [linux-3.18 bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-pair

2016-12-23 Thread osstest service owner
branch xen-unstable xenbranch xen-unstable job test-amd64-i386-pair testid xen-boot/src_host Tree: linux git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git Tree: linuxfirmware git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/linux-firmware.git Tree: qemu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen-traditional

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.4-testing baseline-only test] 68265: tolerable FAIL

2016-12-23 Thread Platform Team regression test user
This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 68265 xen-4.4-testing real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68265/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 16 guest-stop

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.8-testing test] 103847: regressions - FAIL

2016-12-23 Thread osstest service owner
flight 103847 xen-4.8-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103847/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-pygrub 9 debian-di-installfail REGR. vs. 103807 Regressions whi

[Xen-devel] [linux-4.1 test] 103832: regressions - FAIL

2016-12-23 Thread osstest service owner
flight 103832 linux-4.1 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103832/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl 6 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 101737 test-amd64-amd64-xl-m

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline baseline-only test] 68266: regressions - FAIL

2016-12-23 Thread Platform Team regression test user
This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 68266 qemu-mainline real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68266/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-pair 11 host-ping-check-x