Re: [Xen-devel] [early RFC] ARM PCI Passthrough design document

2017-01-29 Thread Manish Jaggi
Hello Julien, On 01/25/2017 08:55 PM, Julien Grall wrote: > Hello Manish, > > On 25/01/17 04:37, Manish Jaggi wrote: >> On 01/24/2017 11:13 PM, Julien Grall wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 19/01/17 05:09, Manish Jaggi wrote: I think, PCI passthrough and DOM0 w/ACPI enumerating devices on PCI are

Re: [Xen-devel] [DOC v8] PV Calls protocol design

2017-01-29 Thread Oleksandr Andrushchenko
On 01/27/2017 08:48 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Fri, 27 Jan 2017, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: Hi, Stefano! Error numbers The numbers corresponding to the error names specified by POSIX are: [EPERM] -1 [ENOENT]-2 Don't you want to use Xen's errno.h

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v15] This is the ABI for the two halves of a para-virtualized sound driver to communicate with each to other.

2017-01-29 Thread Oleksandr Andrushchenko
On 01/27/2017 08:57 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 08:38:29PM +0200, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: On 01/27/2017 08:13 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: .snip.. I am looking at this from FAE's or integrator's POV, when one would need FAE? Field Applications Engine

[Xen-devel] [seabios baseline-only test] 68498: tolerable FAIL

2017-01-29 Thread Platform Team regression test user
This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 68498 seabios real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68498/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 16 guest-stop

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/xen: Fix APIC id mismatch warning on Intel

2017-01-29 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 01/26/2017 01:12 PM, Mohit Gambhir wrote: This patch fixes the following warning message seen when booting the kernel as Dom0 with Xen on Intel machines. [0.003000] [Firmware Bug]: CPU1: APIC id mismatch. Firmware: 0 APIC: 1] The code generating the warning in validate_apic_and_package_id(

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] xen/net: limit number of tx/rx queues

2017-01-29 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 01/10/2017 08:32 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: The Xen network frontend/backend supports multiple tx/rx queues for one virtual interface. The number of queues supported by the backend is set to the number of cpus of the backend driver domain (usually dom0) and the number of queues requested by th

[Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 104943: regressions - FAIL

2017-01-29 Thread osstest service owner
flight 104943 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/104943/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit2 14 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 59254 test-amd64-i386-xl-

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 104924: regressions - FAIL

2017-01-29 Thread osstest service owner
flight 104924 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/104924/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 104681 test-amd64-a

[Xen-devel] [seabios test] 104940: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2017-01-29 Thread osstest service owner
flight 104940 seabios real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/104940/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 16 guest-stop fail like 104213 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-a

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xen-netfront: Fix Rx stall during network stress and OOM

2017-01-29 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 01/19/2017 11:35 AM, Vineeth Remanan Pillai wrote: From: Vineeth Remanan Pillai During an OOM scenario, request slots could not be created as skb allocation fails. So the netback cannot pass in packets and netfront wrongly assumes that there is no more work to be done and it disables polli

[Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 104917: regressions - FAIL

2017-01-29 Thread osstest service owner
flight 104917 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/104917/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit2 17 guest-localmigrate/x10fail REGR. vs. 59254 test-amd64-i386-xl-

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline baseline-only test] 68495: tolerable trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

2017-01-29 Thread Platform Team regression test user
This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 68495 qemu-mainline real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68495/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 6 xen-boot

[Xen-devel] [ovmf baseline-only test] 68496: all pass

2017-01-29 Thread Platform Team regression test user
This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 68496 ovmf real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68496/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: ovmf 465663e9f128428323e6c6e4431dd15ac287a24c baseline v

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 104878: regressions - FAIL

2017-01-29 Thread osstest service owner
flight 104878 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/104878/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 104681 test-amd64-a

[Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 104884: regressions - FAIL

2017-01-29 Thread osstest service owner
flight 104884 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/104884/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit2 14 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 59254 test-amd64-i386-xl-

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen ARM - Exposing a PL011 to the guest

2017-01-29 Thread Christoffer Dall
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 05:44:15PM +0530, Bhupinder Thakur wrote: > Hi, > > I have done the changes for emulating pl011 in Xen. Currently, I have > verified the emulation code by manually reading/writing data to > /dev/ttyAMA0 which is the device file for pl011 device. The data is > flowing fine b

[Xen-devel] [libvirt test] 104886: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2017-01-29 Thread osstest service owner
flight 104886 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/104886/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 13 saverestore-support-checkfail like 104685 test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 13

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-coverity test] 104901: all pass - PUSHED

2017-01-29 Thread osstest service owner
flight 104901 xen-unstable-coverity real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/104901/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: xen 40705830907aae52dc679362b7ec214b9ff25681 baseline version: xen c13f