Hello Julien,
On 01/25/2017 08:55 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hello Manish,
>
> On 25/01/17 04:37, Manish Jaggi wrote:
>> On 01/24/2017 11:13 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 19/01/17 05:09, Manish Jaggi wrote:
I think, PCI passthrough and DOM0 w/ACPI enumerating devices on PCI are
On 01/27/2017 08:48 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jan 2017, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
Hi, Stefano!
Error numbers
The numbers corresponding to the error names specified by POSIX are:
[EPERM] -1
[ENOENT]-2
Don't you want to use Xen's errno.h
On 01/27/2017 08:57 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 08:38:29PM +0200, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
On 01/27/2017 08:13 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
.snip..
I am looking at this from FAE's or integrator's POV, when one would need
FAE?
Field Applications Engine
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 68498 seabios real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68498/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 16 guest-stop
On 01/26/2017 01:12 PM, Mohit Gambhir wrote:
This patch fixes the following warning message seen when booting the
kernel as Dom0 with Xen on Intel machines.
[0.003000] [Firmware Bug]: CPU1: APIC id mismatch. Firmware: 0 APIC: 1]
The code generating the warning in validate_apic_and_package_id(
On 01/10/2017 08:32 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
The Xen network frontend/backend supports multiple tx/rx queues for one
virtual interface. The number of queues supported by the backend is
set to the number of cpus of the backend driver domain (usually dom0)
and the number of queues requested by th
flight 104943 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/104943/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit2 14 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 59254
test-amd64-i386-xl-
flight 104924 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/104924/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs.
104681
test-amd64-a
flight 104940 seabios real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/104940/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 16 guest-stop fail like 104213
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-a
On 01/19/2017 11:35 AM, Vineeth Remanan Pillai wrote:
From: Vineeth Remanan Pillai
During an OOM scenario, request slots could not be created as skb
allocation fails. So the netback cannot pass in packets and netfront
wrongly assumes that there is no more work to be done and it disables
polli
flight 104917 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/104917/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit2 17 guest-localmigrate/x10fail REGR. vs. 59254
test-amd64-i386-xl-
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 68495 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68495/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 6 xen-boot
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 68496 ovmf real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68496/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf 465663e9f128428323e6c6e4431dd15ac287a24c
baseline v
flight 104878 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/104878/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs.
104681
test-amd64-a
flight 104884 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/104884/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit2 14 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 59254
test-amd64-i386-xl-
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 05:44:15PM +0530, Bhupinder Thakur wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have done the changes for emulating pl011 in Xen. Currently, I have
> verified the emulation code by manually reading/writing data to
> /dev/ttyAMA0 which is the device file for pl011 device. The data is
> flowing fine b
flight 104886 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/104886/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 13 saverestore-support-checkfail like 104685
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 13
flight 104901 xen-unstable-coverity real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/104901/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
xen 40705830907aae52dc679362b7ec214b9ff25681
baseline version:
xen c13f
18 matches
Mail list logo