flight 107619 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/107619/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw 3 host-install(3) broken in 107614 pass in 107619
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 15 g
>>> On 24.04.17 at 08:40, wrote:
> As what we talked on IRC last Friday, I have got answers for your
> two final questions below:
> 1. Why domain setting is designed to per-socket, any reason?
> Answer: There is a real case from Intel's customer. HSX (Haswell server)
> and BDX (Broadwell server)
>>> On 24.04.17 at 08:10, wrote:
> On 04/21/2017 06:55 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 21.04.17 at 15:04, wrote:
>>> I am working on a zero-copy scenario for x86
>>> and for that I am mapping pages from Dom0 to DomU
>>> (yes, I know there are at least security concerns).
>>>
>>> Everything is jus
On 17-04-21 00:18:27, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 20.04.17 at 04:14, wrote:
> > On 17-04-19 03:00:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 19.04.17 at 10:22, wrote:
> >> > On 17-04-18 05:46:43, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >> >>> On 18.04.17 at 12:55, wrote:
> >> >> > I made a test patch based on v10 and a
On 21/04/17 16:51, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 04/21/2017 10:45 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 21/04/17 15:38, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> On 21/04/17 16:24, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> +static bool __init xen_check_xsave(void)
> {
> - unsigned int ax, bx, cx, dx;
> - unsigned int xsave_
Hi, Jan!
On 04/21/2017 06:55 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 21.04.17 at 15:04, wrote:
Hi, all!
I am working on a zero-copy scenario for x86
and for that I am mapping pages from Dom0 to DomU
(yes, I know there are at least security concerns).
Everything is just fine, e.g. I can map grefs from Dom0
flight 107623 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/107623/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf f6b139bde7e0a39f83ffad30af58136d5b0738a7
baseline version:
ovmf 205a4b0c15372c004a947
On 22/04/17 03:21, Geliang Tang wrote:
> Use offset_in_page() macro instead of open-coding.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang
Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross
Thanks,
Juergen
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-dev
flight 107618 linux-4.9 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/107618/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm5 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 107358
test-armhf-armhf-xl-c
flight 107616 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/107616/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i3865 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 59254
test-armhf-armhf-xl
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 71221 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/71221/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-pygrub 6 xen-boot
flight 107614 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/107614/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-prev 5 xen-build fail in 107603 REGR. vs. 107560
Tests which are fa
flight 107613 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/107613/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 13 saverestore-support-checkfail like 107594
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw 12 saveresto
flight 107612 linux-4.9 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/107612/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 6 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 107358
Tests which are faili
flight 107610 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/107610/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 14 guest-stop fail in
107598 pass in 107610
test-armhf-arm
flight 107617 xen-unstable-coverity real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/107617/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
xen 07abf27c0fcb53f1bdba58ef1748af36a6f5cb6c
baseline version:
xen 828a
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 71220 linux-3.18 real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/71220/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-xsm 4 host-build-prep
flight 107607 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/107607/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-xl-xsm 11 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 59254
test-armhf-armhf-xl
18 matches
Mail list logo
