flight 112708 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/112708/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-libvirt-xsm 12 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 112655
test-amd64-i386-li
branch xen-4.6-testing
xenbranch xen-4.6-testing
job test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64
testid debian-hvm-install
Tree: linux git://xenbits.xen.org/linux-pvops.git
Tree: linuxfirmware git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/linux-firmware.git
Tree: qemu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen-traditional.git
Tree:
flight 112709 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/112709/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-arm64-arm64-libvirt-xsm 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
build-arm64-libvirt 1 build-check(1)
flight 112706 xen-4.5-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/112706/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 10 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs.
110906
test-amd
flight 112704 xen-4.7-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/112704/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-4 48 xtf/test-hvm64-lbr-tsx-vmentry fail REGR. vs. 112667
test-amd64-i386
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 71995 ovmf real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/71995/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf ba40cb31b69df76a3392219a78cbd7b49ae24c49
baseline v
flight 112702 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/112702/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf ba40cb31b69df76a3392219a78cbd7b49ae24c49
baseline version:
ovmf 3a424c5f49239b810e08a
flight 112701 xen-4.8-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/112701/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 10 debian-hvm-install fail REGR.
vs. 112664
test
From: Bernd Kuhls
The variable domctl.u.address_size.size may remain uninitialized if
guest_type is not one of xen-3.0-aarch64 or xen-3.0-armv7l. And the
code precisely checks if this variable is still 0 to decide if the
guest type is supported or not.
This fixes the following build failure with
flight 112698 xen-4.6-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/112698/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 10 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 112661
test-amd64-i38
flight 112696 xen-4.9-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/112696/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-libvirt-xsm 12 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 112647
test-amd64-i386
flight 71994 distros-debian-stretch real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/71994/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-arm64-arm64-armhf-stretch-netboot-pygrub 1 build-check(1)blocked n/a
build-arm64-pvops
This is for the proposal "Allow setting up shared memory areas between VMs
from xl config file". See:
https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2017-07/msg03047.html
Then plan is to use XENMEM_add_to_physmap_batch to map the shared pages from
one domU to another and use XENMEM_remove
flight 112695 linux-next real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/112695/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 112673
test-amd64-i386-xl-q
At 20:04 +0200 on 18 Aug (1503086640), Dario Faggioli wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I know, v2 of this series just went out. But since I leave for 2 weeks, I
> wanted the version with as much as possible comments addressed to be on the
> list, and since it was rather quick to do that (and test it), for latest
flight 112694 linux-3.18 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/112694/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-arm64-pvops 3 capture-logs broken REGR. vs. 112102
build-armhf-xsm
16 matches
Mail list logo