Hi Dario and Olivier,
I have just encountered this issue in the past. While the fix mentioned in the
link is effective, I assume the fix was derived from upstream linux and it will
introduce new error as mentioned below.
While there is a kernel bug in the guest kernel, I think the root cause is
Thanks Jianfeng for taking time to reply.
please allow me to briefly explain why I want to run dpdk on xen.
our system is based on dpdk, which means we use dpdk as packet
receive/transmit engine,
and with integrated dpdk virtio/vmxnet3 driver, our system can run on
KVM/VMware platform .
this
It changes the memebers in 'cos_write_info' to transfer the feature array,
feature properties array and value array. Then, we can write all features
values on the cos id into MSRs.
Because multiple features may co-exist, we need handle all features to write
values of them into a COS register with
flight 114112 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/114112/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 12 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 113972
Tests which
flight 114091 xen-4.9-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/114091/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 16 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail REGR. vs.
113367
flight 114089 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/114089/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 16 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 114069
On 17-10-06 15:38:35, Roger Pau Monn� wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 09:13:00AM +, Yi Sun wrote:
> > It changes the memebers in 'cos_write_info' to transfer the feature array,
> > feature properties array and value array. Then, we can write all features
> > values on the cos id into MSRs.
>
flight 114110 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/114110/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 12 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 113972
Tests which
flight 114086 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/114086/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-armhf-pvops 6 kernel-build fail in 114055 REGR. vs. 114086
Tests which are
flight 114108 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/114108/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 12 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 113972
Tests which
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 72213 ovmf real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/72213/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf 08e94eee947bd3ff4a6645e303dd86853cb6d8ba
baseline
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 72212 xen-4.7-testing real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/72212/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
flight 114088 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/114088/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 14 saverestore-support-checkfail like 114057
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 14
flight 114104 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/114104/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 12 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 113972
Tests which
flight 114083 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/114083/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-intel 12 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 114042
flight 114098 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/114098/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 12 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 113972
Tests which
On 10/05/2017 06:29 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 04/10/17 19:10, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
sorry, pressed send too fast
On 10/04/2017 09:02 PM, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
On 10/04/2017 08:22 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
On 04/10/17 17:32, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
Hi, all!
flight 114075 seabios real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/114075/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 10 debian-hvm-install fail
REGR. vs. 113870
Tests
flight 114074 xen-4.5-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/114074/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruck 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 113448
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 72211 xen-4.8-testing real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/72211/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win10-i386 16
flight 114078 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/114078/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf 08e94eee947bd3ff4a6645e303dd86853cb6d8ba
baseline version:
ovmf
flight 114095 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/114095/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 12 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 113972
Tests which
flight 114076 xtf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/114076/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
xtf b10eb8666d5bf72ad38f994aed8faefb3b0bb49b
baseline version:
xtf
flight 114073 xen-4.6-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/114073/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 16 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail REGR. vs.
113398
Hi Julien,
On 10/07/2017 12:29 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>
>
> On 07/10/2017 11:18, Sergej Proskurin wrote:
>> Hi all,
>
> Hello Sergej,
>
>>
>> just wanted to friendly remind you about the next altp2m on ARM patch
>> series, since it has been submitted for over a month now and got
>> somewhat
flight 114094 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/114094/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 12 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 113972
Tests which
On 07/10/2017 11:18, Sergej Proskurin wrote:
Hi all,
Hello Sergej,
just wanted to friendly remind you about the next altp2m on ARM patch
series, since it has been submitted for over a month now and got
somewhat lost on xen-devel.
I understand that it is too late to get this patch series
flight 72210 distros-debian-stretch real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/72210/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-arm64-arm64-armhf-stretch-netboot-pygrub 1 build-check(1)blocked n/a
build-arm64-pvops
Hi all,
just wanted to friendly remind you about the next altp2m on ARM patch
series, since it has been submitted for over a month now and got
somewhat lost on xen-devel.
I understand that it is too late to get this patch series into 4.10.
Yet, I would like to queue the series for 4.11. Please
flight 114072 xen-4.7-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/114072/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 14 saverestore-support-checkfail like 113412
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw 13
flight 114090 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/114090/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 12 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 113972
Tests which
flight 114071 xen-4.8-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/114071/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds 16 guest-start/debian.repeatfail like 113371
flight 114070 xen-4.9-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/114070/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 16 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail REGR. vs.
113367
33 matches
Mail list logo
