ux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Cc: xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Gleixner
---
arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 41 +++--
include/linux/cpuhotplug.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/ar
from what I see since it we don't switch CPUs while invoking the function.
Signed-off-by: Richard Cochran
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Cc: Stefano Stabellini
Cc: xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Gleixner
---
arch/arm/xen/enlighten.
On Wed, 6 Apr 2016, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 04/04/16 13:32, Anna-Maria Gleixner wrote:
> > Xen guests do not offline/online CPUs during suspend/resume and
> > therefore FROZEN notifier transitions are not required. Add this
> > explanation as a comment in the code to
-de...@lists.xenproject.org
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Gleixner
---
arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c |6 ++
arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c |7 +++
drivers/xen/events/events_fifo.c |6 ++
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
--- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
+++ b/arch/arm/xen
Hi,
the hotplug notifieres in the following files don't handle the
corresponding FROZEN transitions:
arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
drivers/xen/events/events_fifo.c
Is there a reason for it?
Anna-Maria
___
Xen-dev
On Fri, 11 Mar 2016, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 11/03/16 09:00, Anna-Maria Gleixner wrote:
> > The evtchn_fifo_cpu_notification() hotplug callback lacks handling of
> > the CPU_UP_CANCELED case. That means, if CPU_UP_PREPARE fails, the
> > handle of the fifo events is not
Ostrovsky
Cc: David Vrabel
Cc: xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Gleixner
---
drivers/xen/events/events_fifo.c |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/drivers/xen/events/events_fifo.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/events/events_fifo.c
@@ -432,6 +432,7 @@ static int
