On 08/29/2017 04:53 PM, Gary R Hook wrote:
Hm. For some odd reason I stopped receiving xen-devel mail a while ago.
I never
unsubscribed, never turned anything off (to the best of my knowledge). Now
a co-worker is unable to subscribe.
What's up with that? Any ideas?
Looks like we may h
Hm. For some odd reason I stopped receiving xen-devel mail a while ago.
I never
unsubscribed, never turned anything off (to the best of my knowledge). Now
a co-worker is unable to subscribe.
What's up with that? Any ideas?
Gary
___
Xen-devel mailing
On 5/24/2017 1:43 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.05.17 at 23:51, wrote:
On 5/23/2017 4:46 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 05/23/2017 05:28 PM, Gary R Hook wrote:
Signed-off-by: Gary R Hook
---
xen/arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c |4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/xen
On 5/23/2017 4:46 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 05/23/2017 05:28 PM, Gary R Hook wrote:
Signed-off-by: Gary R Hook
---
xen/arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c |4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c b/xen/arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c
index
Signed-off-by: Gary R Hook
---
xen/arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c |4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c b/xen/arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c
index 13534d491405..5ad48c12e515 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/oprofile
On 05/18/2017 03:16 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
So using your example, the config file should look like:
extra = "root=/dev/xvda1 console=hvc0"
kernel = "/root/64/vmlinuz-4.11.0-pvh+"
ramdisk = "/root/64/initrd.img-4.11.0-pvh+"
builder="hvm"
device_model_version="none"
memory = 4096
name = "sosp
On 5/16/2017 12:13 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 05/16/2017 11:52 AM, Gary R Hook wrote:
A PVH guest's config looks something like
kernel="/root/64/vmlinux"
May I ask from whence this kernel came?
One of 4.11's rcs. Make sure you set CONFIG_XEN_PVH in your .config f
On 05/16/2017 04:36 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 16/05/17 03:54, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
2) Or, perhaps more importantly, what distinguishes said guest?
Simplifying things a bit, it's an HVM guest that doesn't have device
model (i.e. qemu) and which is booted directly (i.e. without hvmloader
On 05/15/2017 09:54 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
Possibly stupid question time...
On 05/15/2017 03:51 PM, Gary R Hook wrote:
2) Or, perhaps more importantly, what distinguishes said guest?
Simplifying things a bit, it's an HVM guest that doesn't have device
model (i.e. qemu)
So I've been slogging through online docs and the code, trying to
understand where things stand with PVH.
I think my primary questions are:
1) How do I identify a PVHv2/HVMlite guest?
2) Or, perhaps more importantly, what distinguishes said guest?
I've got Xen 4.9 unstable built/installed/bo
I'm reading through the page at https://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Linux_PVH,
because, well, it
claims that AMD hardware isn't supported. That bothers me.
The date on the page is December 2014. Is there nothing more current to
be found?
The roadmap page is also stale. Is there an updated roadmap somew
11 matches
Mail list logo
