On 10/11/14 18:01, Ian Jackson wrote:
> * Domain name(s) which you use to provide Xen software/services.
This makes sense for a services provider but I'm not sure what it means
for a distro. Is this intended to mean a download location for an
installation image and updates?If it's a down
I needed xen-detect this morning so as usual I pulled it from git and it
didn't work and it threw a compilation warning. Thinking the problem
was the strict-aliasing warning (patch 1) I fixed that and ... it still
didn't work. Well, that's not entirely true, it was just
over-enthusiastically cla
At some stage, the cpuid instruction used to detect a xen hvm domain
also started working in a pv domain so pv domains were being identified
as hvm (dom0 excepted). Change the order so that pv is tested for
first.
Signed-off-by: John Haxby
---
tools/misc/xen-detect.c | 12 ++--
1 file
t32_t *)(signature + 0) = regs[1];
^
Signed-off-by: John Haxby
---
tools/misc/xen-detect.c | 21 ++---
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/misc/xen-detect.c b/tools/misc/xen-detect.c
index 787b5da..19c66d1 100644
--- a/tools/misc/xen-detect.c
> On 1 Dec 2014, at 17:15, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>
> On 01/12/14 14:37, John Haxby wrote:
>> With gcc 4.8.3, compiling xen-detect gives a compilation warning if
>> you're optimising:
>>
>> $ cc -Wall -Os xen-detect.c
>> xen-detect.c: In function ‘c
On 01/12/14 17:15, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 01/12/14 14:37, John Haxby wrote:
>> With gcc 4.8.3, compiling xen-detect gives a compilation warning if
>> you're optimising:
>>
>> $ cc -Wall -Os xen-detect.c
>> xen-detect.c: In function ‘check_for_xen’:
>&g
On 23/10/16 21:48, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> Has anyone thought of writing Xen RNG (PV) driver?
>
> Afaik currently there's no access to hardware accelerated RNGs from Xen VMs,
> so for example SSL/TLS operations can result in low entropy and blocking
> /dev/random in Xen VMs, resulting in poor
On 14/11/16 14:05, Jason Long wrote:
> Thank you but the problem is that "virt-manager" is for Redhat and Redhat
> don't like Xen anymore because of KVM. Another problem is that a program like
> VirtualBox has a nice GUI but virt-manager not.
virt-manager is also available for Fedora and Fedora
nose off to spite your face.
jch
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, November 15, 2016 2:16 PM, John Haxby
> wrote:
> On 14/11/16 14:05, Jason Long wrote:
>> Thank you but the problem is that "virt-manager" is for Redhat and Redhat
>> don't like Xen anymore be
