y <graeme.greg...@linaro.org>
Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zh...@intel.com>
Link:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1421720467-7709-4-git-send-email-jiang@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.le...@oracle.com>
---
arch/x86/inc
Hey Ian,
Sorry - I forgot to reply. It's in my stable queue and will be shipped in
the next release.
Thanks,
Sasha
On 09/11/2015 11:10 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> ping?
>
> On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 10:18 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> [resending to correct stable address, sorry folks]
>>
>> On Wed,
...@redhat.com
Cc: H. Peter Anvin h...@zytor.com
Cc: Jan Beulich jbeul...@suse.com
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk konrad.w...@oracle.com
Cc: Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra pet...@infradead.org
Cc: Sasha Levin sasha.le...@oracle.com
Cc: Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org
On 07/17/2015 10:09 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 07/17/2015 09:59 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 15:54 -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
Commit 63753fac67e1 (x86: Store a per-cpu shadow copy of CR4) in
3.18.y branch introduced a regression on PVH Xen guests.
Please apply
...@lists.xensource.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150417190448.ga9...@l.oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sasha.le...@oracle.com
---
arch/x86/Kconfig | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
]
Reported-by: Sasha Levin sasha.le...@oracle.com
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T raghavendra...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
Sasha, Hope this addresses invalid read concern you had with latest
xadd based implementation.
(Think we need
On 02/10/2015 04:30 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
So I think Raghavendra's last version (which hopefully fixes the
lockup problem that Sasha reported) together with changing that
V2 did pass the stress, but getting confirmation Sasha would help.
I've been running it for the last two days, and
On 02/06/2015 02:42 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
On Fri, 2015-02-06 at 08:25 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 6:49 AM, Raghavendra K T
raghavendra...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Paravirt spinlock clears slowpath flag after doing unlock.
[ fix edited out ]
So I'm not going to
, viz., slowpath still
could be set when somebody does arch_trylock. Handle that too by ignoring
slowpath flag during lock availability check.
Reported-by: Sasha Levin sasha.le...@oracle.com
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T raghavendra
