Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] arm/xen: don't inclide rwlock.h directly.1~B

2017-10-05 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2017-10-05 12:58:32 [-0700], Stefano Stabellini wrote: > Let me know if you want this patch to go via the xen tree. Yes, please. Sebastian ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] arm/xen: don't inclide rwlock.h directly.

2017-10-05 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
rwlock.h should not be included directly. Instead linux/splinlock.h should be included. One thing it does is to break the RT build. Cc: Stefano Stabellini Cc: xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior --- arch/arm/xen/p2m.c

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] xen/x86: Convert to hotplug state machine

2016-09-08 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2016-09-07 13:19:00 [-0400], Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > * Be more careful with return value of cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls() > as it may return a positive (non-error) number. (Which suggests > that comment on top of __cpuhp_setup_state() is probably incorrect) Yes, we need to update that one. T

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] xen/x86: Convert to hotplug state machine

2016-08-31 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2016-08-26 15:37:38 [-0400], Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > > If you do find the time, you might manage to rework the code to avoid > > using the _nocalls() function. If see this right, you use > > xen_setup_vcpu_info_placement() for the init in the first place. This > > uses for_each_possible_cpu mac

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] xen/x86: Convert to hotplug state machine

2016-08-17 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2016-08-15 10:46:46 [-0400], Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > Switch to new CPU hotplug infrastructure. > > Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky > Suggested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior > --- > arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 115 > +---

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1 0/2] x86/init: extend quirk use

2016-04-11 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 04/09/2016 02:22 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > What seems a bit odd is CE4100 leaves RTC enabled, can someone > confirm if indeed it really needs it, or can it also disable it > as with Xen, lguest, and Intel MID ? So what you do with "x86_platform.legacy.rtc" is to skip add_rtc_cmos(). For ce