for me, the most important thing at the moment, is to run our system
on xen guest (aka DomU), with the full functions. the performance
could be a secondary consideration.
most of time, for our guests, full functions, with the
acceptable performance, is fine.
do we have plan to support xen net
Hi,
On 10/8/2017 12:54 PM, Bill Bonaparte wrote:
Thanks Jianfeng for taking time to reply.
please allow me to briefly explain why I want to run dpdk on xen.
our system is based on dpdk, which means we use dpdk as packet
receive/transmit engine,
and with integrated dpdk virtio/vmxnet3 driver,
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2017 3:31 PM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng
> Cc: Richardson, Bruce; d...@dpdk.org; xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org;
> Mcnamara, John; joao.m.mart...@oracle.com;
> jerin.ja.
> -Original Message-
> From: Richardson, Bruce
> Sent: Monday, September 4, 2017 10:49 PM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng
> Cc: d...@dpdk.org; xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org; tho...@monjalon.net;
> Mcnamara, John; joao.m.mart...@oracle.com;
> jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com;
Hi Thomas and all,
Apologize for being an unqualified maintainer.
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> Sent: Friday, May 5, 2017 6:04 AM
> To: Joao Martins; Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk; Tan, Jianfeng
> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk; d...@dpdk
Hi Thomas and Konrad,
On 11/11/2016 2:59 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Thomas Monjalon
wrote:
2016-11-07 07:38, Jianfeng Tan:
As some users are still using xen as the hypervisor, I suggest to
continue support for xen in DPDK. And from 16.11, I will be the
m
