This platform is no longer actively used, but it makes GICv2 development
harder.
Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.k...@linaro.org>
---
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 7c1bf82..12f147c 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -177,11 +177,6 @@ S: Supported
F: xen/ar
in the early versions, and I looked
everywhere in the archives to figure out why it was dropped before
upstreaming, but I couldn't find it.
Other than this bit:
Reviewed-by: Zoltan Kiss zoltan.k...@huawei.com
Tested-by: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi shameerali.kolothum.th...@huawei.com
And sorry
On 01/06/15 13:11, Julien Grall wrote:
On 01/06/15 12:25, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
Hi,
Yes, we managed to test it, and it works. Then only thing I've found is
this bit:
+/* Only 1020 interrupts are supported */
+gicv2_info.nr_lines = min(1020U, nr_lines);
This interrupt controller only
On 15/05/15 22:08, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Zoltan,
On 07/05/2015 13:37, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
On 07/05/15 10:32, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 09:52 +0100, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
Looks good at first glance, let me try it on a board.
On 06/05/15 19:52, Julien Grall wrote:
[...]
I'm
I'm still working there, but as a Linaro assignee for LNG. Julian's last
mail fell through unfortunately, sorry about that.
Zoli
On 07/05/15 09:25, Olaf Hering wrote:
On Thu, May 07, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
Yes, he left indeed.
M:Zoltan Kiss zoltan.k...@huawei.com
What about you
in order to check
the validity of an IRQ.
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall julien.gr...@linaro.org
Acked-by: Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com
Cc: Frediano Ziglio frediano.zig...@huawei.com
Cc: Zoltan Kiss zoltan.k...@huawei.com
commit
On 06/05/15 19:56, Julien Grall wrote:
His email address is bouncing from more than a month.
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall julien.gr...@citrix.com
Cc: Ian Jackson ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com
Cc: Keir Fraser k...@xen.org
Cc: Jan Beulich jbeul...@suse.com
Cc: Zoltan Kiss zoltan.k...@huawei.com
On 07/05/15 10:52, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Zoltan,
On 07/05/2015 09:21, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
On 06/05/15 19:56, Julien Grall wrote:
His email address is bouncing from more than a month.
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall julien.gr...@citrix.com
Cc: Ian Jackson ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com
Cc: Keir
Hi,
On 07/05/15 10:32, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 09:52 +0100, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
Looks good at first glance, let me try it on a board.
On 06/05/15 19:52, Julien Grall wrote:
[...]
I'm concerned to see a newly driver (pushed last march) already orphan.
Does Huawei still plan
On 07/05/15 15:14, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 07.05.15 at 12:11, zoltan.k...@linaro.org wrote:
On 07/05/15 10:52, Julien Grall wrote:
On 07/05/2015 09:21, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
On 06/05/15 19:56, Julien Grall wrote:
His email address is bouncing from more than a month.
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall
On 19/03/15 03:40, openlui wrote:
Hi, all:
I am trying to use a HVM with PCI pass-through NIC as network driver domain.
However, when I send packets whose size are larger than 128 bytes from DomU
using pkt-gen tools, after several seconds, the network between driver domain
and destination
Hi,
In that case I recommend you to take a look at the debugfs patch already
in there, based on that it should be pretty straightforward to do it
what you want:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=f51de243
It already prints out queue-napi.weight
Hi,
I reckon you want to do this for the same reason you started this thread
a month ago:
http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-02/msg00228.html
Have you considered the suggestions given there? (using the existing
traffic shaping facilities of the kernel). As Wei said, you would
thread is descheduled or there is an
interrupt or softirq).
Signed-off-by: David Vrabel david.vra...@citrix.com
Reviewed-by: Zoltan Kiss zoltan.k...@linaro.org
---
drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c | 23 ---
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git
-by: David Vrabel david.vra...@citrix.com
Reviewed-by: Zoltan Kiss zoltan.k...@linaro.org
---
drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c | 43 +++--
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
b/drivers/net/xen-netback
strongly recommend to look for other ways I
mentioned in my previous letter.
Thanks
Ronald
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Zoltan Kiss zoltan.k...@linaro.org
mailto:zoltan.k...@linaro.org wrote:
On 03/02/15 00:42, Ronald PIna wrote:
Hi
I am working for the msc thesis
On 03/02/15 00:42, Ronald PIna wrote:
Hi
I am working for the msc thesis to improve the performance on network
for guest domains that uses real-time services like voip or video
streaming servers , i have an idea to implement a network scheduler on
network backend, the schedulers may be
On 04/01/15 06:15, Zhangleiqiang (Trump) wrote:
On 31/12/14 09:06, Zhangleiqiang (Trump) wrote:
Hi, all:
I have used pkt-gen to send udp packet (1400 bytes) from one Dom0 A to
another Dom0 B each of which is connected by 10GE network. On the receive
side (B)，different ksoftirqd/x
On 08/01/2015 02:33, trump_zhang wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to test the single-queue networking performance for
netback/netfront in upstream, my testing environment is as follows:
1. Using pkt-gen to send a single UDP flow from one host to a vm
which runs on another XEN host. Two hosts
Hi,
This has been fixed by f48da8: xen-netback: fix unlimited guest Rx
internal queue and carrier flapping, it's already in 3.18, I don't know
if it is going to be backported to 3.17
Zoli
On 11/12/14 14:42, Christopher S. Aker wrote:
Xen: 4.4.2-pre (28573:f6f6236af933) + xsa111, xsa112,
On 04/12/14 12:09, Zhangleiqiang (Trump) wrote:
I think that's expected, because guest RX data path still uses grant_copy while
guest TX uses grant_map to do zero-copy transmit.
As I understand, the RX process is as follows:
1. Phy NIC receive packet
2. XEN Hypervisor trigger interrupt to
On 02/12/14 11:53, Zhangleiqiang (Trump) wrote:
-Original Message-
From: xen-devel-boun...@lists.xen.org
[mailto:xen-devel-boun...@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of David Vrabel
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 6:57 PM
To: zhangleiqiang; xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Poor
On 01/12/14 13:36, David Vrabel wrote:
On 01/12/14 08:55, Stefan Bader wrote:
On 11.08.2014 19:32, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
There is a long known problem with the netfront/netback interface: if the guest
tries to send a packet which constitues more than MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1 ring slots,
it gets
Hi,
I would check whether GRO is enabled under Dom0 or not (ethtool -k
ethX). Comparing top during test (especially that which context use how
many percentage), and the number of interrupts per second (grep eth
/proc/interrupts) would be interesting too.
Regards,
Zoltan
On 28/11/14 02:29,
24 matches
Mail list logo
