This is using Debian Jessie and grub 2.02~beta2-22 (with Debian patches
applied) and Xen 4.4.1
I originally posted a bug report with Debian but got the suggestion to
file bugs with upstream as well.
Debian bug report:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=799480
Note that my original
On 22.09.2015 10:53, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Hi Vladimir & grub-devel,
>
> Do you have any thoughts on this issue with i386 pv-grub2?
>
Is it still an issue? If so I'll try to replicate it. From stack dump I
see that it has jumped to NULL. GRUB has no threads so it's not a race
condition with itsel
On 22/01/16 12:56, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> On 22.09.2015 10:53, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> Hi Vladimir & grub-devel,
>>
>> Do you have any thoughts on this issue with i386 pv-grub2?
>>
> Is it still an issue? If so I'll try to replicate it. From stack dump I
> see that it has jum
On 22.01.2016 14:01, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 22/01/16 12:56, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>> On 22.09.2015 10:53, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> Hi Vladimir & grub-devel,
>>>
>>> Do you have any thoughts on this issue with i386 pv-grub2?
>>>
>> Is it still an issue? If so I'll try to rep
On 22/01/16 13:08, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> On 22.01.2016 14:01, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 22/01/16 12:56, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>>> On 22.09.2015 10:53, Ian Campbell wrote:
Hi Vladimir & grub-devel,
Do you have any thoughts on this issue
On 2016-01-22 13:56, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> On 22.09.2015 10:53, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> Hi Vladimir & grub-devel,
>>
>> Do you have any thoughts on this issue with i386 pv-grub2?
>>
> Is it still an issue? If so I'll try to replicate it. From stack dump I
> see that it has j
On 21/09/2015 21:03, Andreas Sundstrom wrote:
> This is using Debian Jessie and grub 2.02~beta2-22 (with Debian patches
> applied) and Xen 4.4.1
>
> I originally posted a bug report with Debian but got the suggestion to
> file bugs with upstream as well.
> Debian bug report:
> https://bugs.debian.o
On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 08:22 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>
> The segment registers indicate that the domU is executing in ring1 which
> makes it a 32bit guest (also why 32bit words are used for the stack
> dump), but r10 through r14 have 64bit values in.
r10..r14 are not visible to 32-bit guests b
Hi Vladimir & grub-devel,
Do you have any thoughts on this issue with i386 pv-grub2?
Thanks, Ian.
On Mon, 2015-09-21 at 22:03 +0200, Andreas Sundstrom wrote:
> This is using Debian Jessie and grub 2.02~beta2-22 (with Debian patches
> applied) and Xen 4.4.1
>
> I originally posted a bug report w
Citerar Andrew Cooper :
On 21/09/2015 21:03, Andreas Sundstrom wrote:
Using 64-bit dom0 and 32-bit domU PV (para-virtualized) grub sometimes
fail when chainloading the domU's grub. 64-bit domU seem to work 100%
of the time.
You say sometimes. Do you mean that repeated attempts to boot a 32b
Andreas Sundstrom, le Mon 21 Sep 2015 22:03:22 +0200, a écrit :
> Note that my original thought was that this bug probably is within GRUB.
It's probably in the GRUB implementation of loading the domU GRUB, since
you say that pvgrub1 loads it fine.
> (XEN) domain_crash_sync called from entry.S: fa
On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 00:37 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Andreas Sundstrom, le Mon 21 Sep 2015 22:03:22 +0200, a écrit :
> > Note that my original thought was that this bug probably is within
> > GRUB.
>
> It's probably in the GRUB implementation of loading the domU GRUB, since
> you say that p
Citerar Samuel Thibault :
Andreas Sundstrom, le Mon 21 Sep 2015 22:03:22 +0200, a écrit :
Note that my original thought was that this bug probably is within GRUB.
It's probably in the GRUB implementation of loading the domU GRUB, since
you say that pvgrub1 loads it fine.
(XEN) domain_crash_
On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 12:47 +, Andreas Sundstrom wrote:
> Citerar Ian Campbell :
>
> > Along those lines, if the _host_ has buckets of RAM then might it be
> > worth
> > restricting it in case the issue is with getting MFNs which are not
> > representably by the 32-bit PV interfaces? (IIRC the
Citerar Ian Campbell :
On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 00:37 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Andreas Sundstrom, le Mon 21 Sep 2015 22:03:22 +0200, a écrit :
> Note that my original thought was that this bug probably is within
> GRUB.
It's probably in the GRUB implementation of loading the domU GRUB, since
On 2015-09-23 16:18, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 12:47 +, Andreas Sundstrom wrote:
>> Citerar Ian Campbell :
>>
>>> Along those lines, if the _host_ has buckets of RAM then might it be
>>> worth
>>> restricting it in case the issue is with getting MFNs which are not
>>> represen
On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 19:28 +0200, Andreas Sundstrom wrote:
> On 2015-09-23 16:18, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 12:47 +, Andreas Sundstrom wrote:
> > > Citerar Ian Campbell :
> > >
> > > > Along those lines, if the _host_ has buckets of RAM then might it
> > > > be
> > > > wor
Citerar Ian Campbell :
On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 19:28 +0200, Andreas Sundstrom wrote:
On 2015-09-23 16:18, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 12:47 +, Andreas Sundstrom wrote:
> > Citerar Ian Campbell :
> >
> > > Along those lines, if the _host_ has buckets of RAM then might it
> > >
18 matches
Mail list logo
