Re: [Xen-devel] [BUGFIX][PATCH for 2.2 1/1] hw/ide/core.c: Prevent SIGSEGV during migration

2014-11-19 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On November 19, 2014 5:52:58 AM EST, Stefano Stabellini > wrote: > >ping? > > > >On Tue, 18 Nov 2014, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > >> Konrad, > >> I think we should have this fix in Xen 4.5. Should I go ahead and > >> backport it? > > Go for it.

Re: [Xen-devel] [BUGFIX][PATCH for 2.2 1/1] hw/ide/core.c: Prevent SIGSEGV during migration

2014-11-19 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On November 19, 2014 5:52:58 AM EST, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >ping? > >On Tue, 18 Nov 2014, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >> Konrad, >> I think we should have this fix in Xen 4.5. Should I go ahead and >> backport it? Go for it. Release-Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk (konrad.w...@oracle.com) >>

Re: [Xen-devel] [BUGFIX][PATCH for 2.2 1/1] hw/ide/core.c: Prevent SIGSEGV during migration

2014-11-19 Thread Stefano Stabellini
ping? On Tue, 18 Nov 2014, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > Konrad, > I think we should have this fix in Xen 4.5. Should I go ahead and > backport it? > > On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, Don Slutz wrote: > > The other callers to blk_set_enable_write_cache() in this file > > already check for s->blk == NULL. > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [BUGFIX][PATCH for 2.2 1/1] hw/ide/core.c: Prevent SIGSEGV during migration

2014-11-18 Thread Stefano Stabellini
Konrad, I think we should have this fix in Xen 4.5. Should I go ahead and backport it? On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, Don Slutz wrote: > The other callers to blk_set_enable_write_cache() in this file > already check for s->blk == NULL. > > Signed-off-by: Don Slutz > --- > > I think this is a bugfix that