>>> On 18.05.15 at 15:24, wrote:
> On 18/05/15 12:43, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 18.05.15 at 12:59, wrote:
>>> +if ( unlikely(num > 1024) ||
>>> + unlikely(num != domctl->u.getpageframeinfo3.num) )
>>> +{
>>> +ret = -E2BIG;
>>> +break;
>>> +
On 18/05/15 12:43, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 18.05.15 at 12:59, wrote:
>> In tree, there is one single caller of XEN_DOMCTL_getpageframeinfo3
>> (xc_get_pfn_type_batch()), and no callers of the older variants.
>>
>> getpageframeinfo3 and getpageframeinfo2 are compatible if the parameter
>> conten
In tree, there is one single caller of XEN_DOMCTL_getpageframeinfo3
(xc_get_pfn_type_batch()), and no callers of the older variants.
getpageframeinfo3 and getpageframeinfo2 are compatible if the parameter
contents are considered to be unsigned long; a compat guest calling
getpageframeinfo3 falls t
>>> On 18.05.15 at 12:59, wrote:
> In tree, there is one single caller of XEN_DOMCTL_getpageframeinfo3
> (xc_get_pfn_type_batch()), and no callers of the older variants.
>
> getpageframeinfo3 and getpageframeinfo2 are compatible if the parameter
> contents are considered to be unsigned long; a co
