On Tue, 21 Feb 2017, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 21.02.17 at 00:26, wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Feb 2017, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 17.02.17 at 23:38, wrote:
> >> But the use of inline functions here is questionable
> >> in the first place - so far there are none, as they're not standard
> >> C89.
>>> On 21.02.17 at 00:26, wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 17.02.17 at 23:38, wrote:
>> But the use of inline functions here is questionable
>> in the first place - so far there are none, as they're not standard
>> C89. Granted they are being used in a macro only, so won
On Mon, 20 Feb 2017, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 17.02.17 at 23:38, wrote:
>
> For all of the comments below, please understand that I'm giving
> them in the understanding that pre-existing code may be similarly
> problematic; we shouldn't introduce new issues though.
I understand, thanks for th
>>> On 17.02.17 at 23:38, wrote:
For all of the comments below, please understand that I'm giving
them in the understanding that pre-existing code may be similarly
problematic; we shouldn't introduce new issues though.
> --- a/xen/include/public/io/ring.h
> +++ b/xen/include/public/io/ring.h
> @
On Fri, 17 Feb 2017, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> This patch introduces macros, structs and functions to handle rings in
> the format described by docs/misc/pvcalls.markdown and
> docs/misc/9pfs.markdown. The index page (struct __name##_data_intf)
> contains the indexes and the grant refs to setup t
This patch introduces macros, structs and functions to handle rings in
the format described by docs/misc/pvcalls.markdown and
docs/misc/9pfs.markdown. The index page (struct __name##_data_intf)
contains the indexes and the grant refs to setup two rings.
Indexes page
+
