On February 23, 2017 4:38 PM, Chao Gao wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 11:55:15AM +, Xuquan (Quan Xu) wrote:
>>On February 23, 2017 7:01 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 23.02.17 at 11:53, wrote:
On February 23, 2017 5:59 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.02.17 at 10:28, wrote:
>
>>> On 24.02.17 at 09:02, wrote:
> Another question, it 'd be the _main_gap_..
> If the pCPU runs __vmx_deliver_posted_interrupt() here, in a
> hyperver-context,
> _iiuc_, all of vCPUs , waiting in the run queue, are scheduled out.. So the
> 'current' is NULL, as there is no running vCPU..
Exc
On February 23, 2017 8:27 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.02.17 at 12:55, wrote:
>> On February 23, 2017 7:01 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 23.02.17 at 11:53, wrote:
IOW,
which vcpu does the 'current' refer to?
which cpu does the ' smp_processor_id()' refer to?
>>>
>>>curren
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 11:55:15AM +, Xuquan (Quan Xu) wrote:
>On February 23, 2017 7:01 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 23.02.17 at 11:53, wrote:
>>> On February 23, 2017 5:59 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 23.02.17 at 10:28, wrote:
> On February 18, 2017 12:33 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 23.02.17 at 12:55, wrote:
> On February 23, 2017 7:01 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 23.02.17 at 11:53, wrote:
>>> IOW,
>>> which vcpu does the 'current' refer to?
>>> which cpu does the ' smp_processor_id()' refer to?
>>
>>current: currently running vCPU
>
> in a SMP machine, are ther
On February 23, 2017 7:01 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.02.17 at 11:53, wrote:
>> On February 23, 2017 5:59 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 23.02.17 at 10:28, wrote:
On February 18, 2017 12:33 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.02.17 at 09:49, wrote:
>>>diff --git a/xen/arch/x86
>>> On 23.02.17 at 11:53, wrote:
> On February 23, 2017 5:59 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 23.02.17 at 10:28, wrote:
>>> On February 18, 2017 12:33 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 17.02.17 at 09:49, wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 09:37:45AM +, Xuquan (Quan Xu) wrote:
>>From a58
On February 23, 2017 5:59 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.02.17 at 10:28, wrote:
>> On February 18, 2017 12:33 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 17.02.17 at 09:49, wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 09:37:45AM +, Xuquan (Quan Xu) wrote:
>From a589074281cc22a30ed75a5bccba60e83d2312a6 Mon
>>> On 23.02.17 at 10:28, wrote:
> On February 18, 2017 12:33 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 17.02.17 at 09:49, wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 09:37:45AM +, Xuquan (Quan Xu) wrote:
From a589074281cc22a30ed75a5bccba60e83d2312a6 Mon Sep 17
>>00:00:00 2001
From: Quan Xu
Date: S
On February 18, 2017 12:33 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.02.17 at 09:49, wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 09:37:45AM +, Xuquan (Quan Xu) wrote:
>>>From a589074281cc22a30ed75a5bccba60e83d2312a6 Mon Sep 17
>00:00:00 2001
>>>From: Quan Xu
>>>Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 09:27:37 +0800
>>>Subject:
> From: Xuquan (Quan Xu) [mailto:xuqu...@huawei.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 12:12 PM
>
> On February 21, 2017 11:07 AM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> >> From: Xuquan (Quan Xu) [mailto:xuqu...@huawei.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 10:49 AM
> >>
> >> On February 20, 2017 4:24 PM, Chao
>>> On 21.02.17 at 07:19, wrote:
> On February 21, 2017 5:55 AM, Chao Gao wrote:
>>On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 04:11:53AM +, Xuquan (Quan Xu) wrote:
>>>The posted_intr_vector handler is not always pi_notification_interrupt.
>>>If the vt-d PI is not enabled, the handler is event_check_interrupt..
>
On February 21, 2017 5:55 AM, Chao Gao wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 04:11:53AM +, Xuquan (Quan Xu) wrote:
>>On February 21, 2017 11:07 AM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
From: Xuquan (Quan Xu) [mailto:xuqu...@huawei.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 10:49 AM
>>Chao, __iiuc__, your que
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 04:11:53AM +, Xuquan (Quan Xu) wrote:
>On February 21, 2017 11:07 AM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>>> From: Xuquan (Quan Xu) [mailto:xuqu...@huawei.com]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 10:49 AM
>>> >>Chao, __iiuc__, your question may be from the comments of
>>> >xen/arch/x86
On February 21, 2017 11:07 AM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Xuquan (Quan Xu) [mailto:xuqu...@huawei.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 10:49 AM
>>
>> On February 20, 2017 4:24 PM, Chao Gao wrote:
>> >On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 11:25:29AM +, Xuquan (Quan Xu) wrote:
>> >>On February 18, 2017 12
> From: Xuquan (Quan Xu) [mailto:xuqu...@huawei.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 10:49 AM
>
> On February 20, 2017 4:24 PM, Chao Gao wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 11:25:29AM +, Xuquan (Quan Xu) wrote:
> >>On February 18, 2017 12:33 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 17.02.17 at 09:4
On February 20, 2017 4:24 PM, Chao Gao wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 11:25:29AM +, Xuquan (Quan Xu) wrote:
>>On February 18, 2017 12:33 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 17.02.17 at 09:49, wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 09:37:45AM +, Xuquan (Quan Xu) wrote:
>From a589074281cc22a3
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 11:25:29AM +, Xuquan (Quan Xu) wrote:
>On February 18, 2017 12:33 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 17.02.17 at 09:49, wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 09:37:45AM +, Xuquan (Quan Xu) wrote:
From a589074281cc22a30ed75a5bccba60e83d2312a6 Mon Sep 17
>>00:00:00 2001
On February 18, 2017 12:33 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.02.17 at 09:49, wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 09:37:45AM +, Xuquan (Quan Xu) wrote:
>>>From a589074281cc22a30ed75a5bccba60e83d2312a6 Mon Sep 17
>00:00:00 2001
>>>From: Quan Xu
>>>Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 09:27:37 +0800
>>>Subject:
>>> On 17.02.17 at 09:49, wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 09:37:45AM +, Xuquan (Quan Xu) wrote:
>>From a589074281cc22a30ed75a5bccba60e83d2312a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>From: Quan Xu
>>Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 09:27:37 +0800
>>Subject: [PATCH] x86/apicv: enhance posted-interrupt processing
>
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 09:37:45AM +, Xuquan (Quan Xu) wrote:
>From a589074281cc22a30ed75a5bccba60e83d2312a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>From: Quan Xu
>Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 09:27:37 +0800
>Subject: [PATCH] x86/apicv: enhance posted-interrupt processing
>
>If guest is already in non-root mode,
>From a589074281cc22a30ed75a5bccba60e83d2312a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Quan Xu
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 09:27:37 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] x86/apicv: enhance posted-interrupt processing
If guest is already in non-root mode, an posted interrupt will
be directly delivered to guest (leaving softir
22 matches
Mail list logo