On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Luckily, due to gfn_unlock() currently mapping to p2m_unlock(), this is
> only a cosmetic issue right now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
Reviewed-by: George Dunlap
> ---
>
Luckily, due to gfn_unlock() currently mapping to p2m_unlock(), this is
only a cosmetic issue right now.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
---
Despite its cosmetic nature I think it would be better to also fix this
in 4.6.
--- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
@@
On 14/09/15 08:13, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Luckily, due to gfn_unlock() currently mapping to p2m_unlock(), this is
> only a cosmetic issue right now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 01:13:31AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Luckily, due to gfn_unlock() currently mapping to p2m_unlock(), this is
> only a cosmetic issue right now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
Reviewed-by: Wei Liu
> ---
> Despite its cosmetic