On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 13:32 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On 17/07/15 21:48, Chris (Christopher) Brand wrote:
> > nr_mods is set in add_boot_module() to the number of module
> > array elements used. This function also ensures that nr_mods
> > never exceeds MAX_MODULES (the size of the
Hi Chris,
On 17/07/15 21:48, Chris (Christopher) Brand wrote:
> nr_mods is set in add_boot_module() to the number of module
> array elements used. This function also ensures that nr_mods
> never exceeds MAX_MODULES (the size of the array). When looping
> through the array, the correct maximum inde
> It looks like the mail as been sent in HTML. Can you resend it in plain text?
Re-sent, hopefully correctly this time.
Chris
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
nr_mods is set in add_boot_module() to the number of module
array elements used. This function also ensures that nr_mods
never exceeds MAX_MODULES (the size of the array). When looping
through the array, the correct maximum index is "nr_mods-1",
not "nr_mods". If the array is full, using the latter
Hi Christopher,
Thank you for the patch.
It looks like the mail as been sent in HTML. Can you resend it in plain
text?
You also need to cc the maintainers of the code you are modifying (I've
CCed them this time).
You can give a look to [1] to know how to send correctly the patch.
On 16/07/15
nr_mods is set in add_boot_module() to the number of module
array elements used. This function also ensures that nr_mods
never exceeds MAX_MODULES (the size of the array). When looping
through the array, the correct maximum index is "nr_mods-1",
not "nr_mods". If the array is full, using the latter