On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 15:01 +, George Dunlap wrote:
On 03/09/2015 04:49 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
93be8285 (update domU's node-affinity on the cpupool_unassign_cpu()
path) does the right thing, but does it too early. In fact, it
is necessary to call domain_update_node_affinity() when a
On 03/09/2015 04:49 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
93be8285 (update domU's node-affinity on the cpupool_unassign_cpu()
path) does the right thing, but does it too early. In fact, it
is necessary to call domain_update_node_affinity() when a pCPU is
removed from a cpupool, but that must happen after
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 17:49 +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
93be8285 (update domU's node-affinity on the cpupool_unassign_cpu()
path) does the right thing, but does it too early. In fact, it
is necessary to call domain_update_node_affinity() when a pCPU is
removed from a cpupool, but that must
93be8285 (update domU's node-affinity on the cpupool_unassign_cpu()
path) does the right thing, but does it too early. In fact, it
is necessary to call domain_update_node_affinity() when a pCPU is
removed from a cpupool, but that must happen after the pCPU is
really gone from there.
More
