Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] libxl: try to support IGD passthrough for qemu upstream

2015-03-09 Thread Chen, Tiejun
On 2015/3/6 23:53, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 05:08:21PM +0800, Tiejun Chen wrote: When we're working to support IGD GFX passthrough with qemu upstream, instead of -gfx_passthru we'd like to make that Could you also include in the cover letter an URL link to the

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] libxl: try to support IGD passthrough for qemu upstream

2015-03-08 Thread Chen, Tiejun
On 2015/3/6 20:28, Wei Liu wrote: On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 05:08:21PM +0800, Tiejun Chen wrote: When we're working to support IGD GFX passthrough with qemu upstream, instead of -gfx_passthru we'd like to make that a machine option, -machine xxx,igd-passthru=on. This need to bring a change on

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] libxl: try to support IGD passthrough for qemu upstream

2015-03-06 Thread Tiejun Chen
When we're working to support IGD GFX passthrough with qemu upstream, instead of -gfx_passthru we'd like to make that a machine option, -machine xxx,igd-passthru=on. This need to bring a change on tool side. After a discussion with Campbell, we'd like to construct a table to record all IGD

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] libxl: try to support IGD passthrough for qemu upstream

2015-03-06 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 05:08:21PM +0800, Tiejun Chen wrote: When we're working to support IGD GFX passthrough with qemu upstream, instead of -gfx_passthru we'd like to make that Could you also include in the cover letter an URL link to the latest discussion on this? Thank you. a machine