Hi Ian,
On 07/07/15 16:19, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 13:20 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Ian,
On 25/06/15 12:23, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2015-06-25 at 11:21 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:55:34PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi all,
This small series
On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 14:57 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Ian,
This is a tools backport, so needs to be Ian J not me.
On 07/07/15 16:19, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 13:20 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Ian,
On 25/06/15 12:23, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2015-06-25 at
On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 13:20 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Ian,
On 25/06/15 12:23, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2015-06-25 at 11:21 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:55:34PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi all,
This small series are the only changes required in Xen in
Hi Ian,
On 25/06/15 12:23, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2015-06-25 at 11:21 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:55:34PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi all,
This small series are the only changes required in Xen in order to run a
guest
using 64K page granularity on top of an
On Thu, 2015-06-25 at 11:21 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:55:34PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi all,
This small series are the only changes required in Xen in order to run a
guest
using 64K page granularity on top of an unmodified Xen.
I'd like feedback from
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:55:34PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi all,
This small series are the only changes required in Xen in order to run a guest
using 64K page granularity on top of an unmodified Xen.
I'd like feedback from maintainers tools to know if it might be worth to
introduce a
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 12:23:26PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2015-06-25 at 11:21 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:55:34PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi all,
This small series are the only changes required in Xen in order to run a
guest
using 64K page
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:55:34PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi all,
This small series are the only changes required in Xen in order to run a guest
using 64K page granularity on top of an unmodified Xen.
I'd like feedback from maintainers tools to know if it might be worth to
introduce a
Hi,
On 25/06/2015 12:23, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2015-06-25 at 11:21 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:55:34PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi all,
This small series are the only changes required in Xen in order to run a guest
using 64K page granularity on top of an
Hi,
Ping? I don't think this patch series depends on others (such as Linux
64K support) to review it.
Regards,
On 11/05/15 12:55, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi all,
This small series are the only changes required in Xen in order to run a guest
using 64K page granularity on top of an unmodified
Hi all,
This small series are the only changes required in Xen in order to run a guest
using 64K page granularity on top of an unmodified Xen.
I'd like feedback from maintainers tools to know if it might be worth to
introduce a function xc_pagesize() replicating the behavior of getpagesize()
for
11 matches
Mail list logo
