On 1/19/17 3:31 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 18.01.17 at 18:38, wrote:
>>
>> What's controversial about it?
>
> The not insignificant amount of assembly code it adds, when our
> overall goal is to reduce the amount of assembly code. But
> Andrew has meanwhile indicated he's okay for this to go
>>> On 18.01.17 at 18:38, wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 13.01.17 at 20:21, wrote:
>>> This is a series based on v11 of Daniel Kiper's
>>> "x86: multiboot2 protocol support" series. It aims to collect up all the
>>> fixes and changes that Andrew Cooper, Ja
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 13.01.17 at 20:21, wrote:
>> This is a series based on v11 of Daniel Kiper's
>> "x86: multiboot2 protocol support" series. It aims to collect up all the
>> fixes and changes that Andrew Cooper, Jan Beulich and myself discovered in
>> co
>>> On 13.01.17 at 20:21, wrote:
> This is a series based on v11 of Daniel Kiper's
> "x86: multiboot2 protocol support" series. It aims to collect up all the
> fixes and changes that Andrew Cooper, Jan Beulich and myself discovered in
> code review and testing on actual hardware. I've had problems
This is a series based on v11 of Daniel Kiper's
"x86: multiboot2 protocol support" series. It aims to collect up all the
fixes and changes that Andrew Cooper, Jan Beulich and myself discovered in
code review and testing on actual hardware. I've had problems with the
relocation portion of the series
