Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/9] Some (not only) cpupool related fixes and improvements

2015-03-11 Thread Dario Faggioli
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 14:56 +, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 18:20 +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > --- > > Dario Faggioli (9): > > 1/9 docs: RTDS is a valid alternative as a scheduler for a cpupool > > 2/9 docs: fix `xl list' manpage entry > > Acked + applied these two. >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/9] Some (not only) cpupool related fixes and improvements

2015-03-11 Thread Ian Campbell
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 18:20 +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote: > Hi everyone, > > The main goal of this series is making it possible to specify ranges of pCPUs > when manipulating (creating, adding/removing pCPUs) cpupools. Something like > this: > > xl cpupool-cpu-remove Pool-node0 6-10 > > while, r

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/9] Some (not only) cpupool related fixes and improvements

2015-03-06 Thread Dario Faggioli
Hi everyone, The main goal of this series is making it possible to specify ranges of pCPUs when manipulating (creating, adding/removing pCPUs) cpupools. Something like this: xl cpupool-cpu-remove Pool-node0 6-10 while, right now, only single pCPU IDs can be specified, which means that, to achie