On 20/12/2016 09:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
> This is a first (of three, as far as current plans go) steps to do away
> with misleading register names (eax instead of rax).
>
> 01: x86/MSR: introduce MSR access split/fold helpers
> 02: x86/guest-walk: use unambiguous register names
> 03: x86/shadow: us
This is a first (of three, as far as current plans go) steps to do away
with misleading register names (eax instead of rax).
01: x86/MSR: introduce MSR access split/fold helpers
02: x86/guest-walk: use unambiguous register names
03: x86/shadow: use unambiguous register names
04: x86/oprofile: use
