> From: Kai Huang [mailto:kai.hu...@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 10:35 AM
>
> Existing PML implementation turns on EPT A/D bit unconditionally if PML is
> supported by hardware. This works but enabling of EPT A/D bit can be deferred
> until PML get enabled. There's no point i
On 20/10/15 03:34, Kai Huang wrote:
> Existing PML implementation turns on EPT A/D bit unconditionally if PML is
> supported by hardware. This works but enabling of EPT A/D bit can be deferred
> until PML get enabled. There's no point in enabling the extra feature for
> every
> domain when we're n
>>> On 20.10.15 at 04:34, wrote:
> Existing PML implementation turns on EPT A/D bit unconditionally if PML is
> supported by hardware. This works but enabling of EPT A/D bit can be
> deferred
> until PML get enabled. There's no point in enabling the extra feature for
> every
> domain when we're
Existing PML implementation turns on EPT A/D bit unconditionally if PML is
supported by hardware. This works but enabling of EPT A/D bit can be deferred
until PML get enabled. There's no point in enabling the extra feature for every
domain when we're not meaning to use it (yet).
Also added ASSERT
