On 10/08/17 18:29, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 06:24:53PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> -ENTRY(xen_irq_enable_direct)
>> -FRAME_BEGIN
>> -/* Unmask events */
>> -movb $0, PER_CPU_VAR(xen_vcpu_info) + XEN_vcpu_info_mask
>> -
>> -/*
>> - * Preempt here doesn'
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 02:52:52PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Xen's paravirt patch function xen_patch() does some special casing for
> irq_ops functions to apply relocations when those functions can be
> patched inline instead of calls.
>
> Unfortunately none of the special case function replac
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 06:24:53PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> -ENTRY(xen_irq_enable_direct)
> - FRAME_BEGIN
> - /* Unmask events */
> - movb $0, PER_CPU_VAR(xen_vcpu_info) + XEN_vcpu_info_mask
> -
> - /*
> - * Preempt here doesn't matter because that will deal with any
> -
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 02:52:52PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Xen's paravirt patch function xen_patch() does some special casing for
> irq_ops functions to apply relocations when those functions can be
> patched inline instead of calls.
>
> Unfortunately none of the special case function replac
Xen's paravirt patch function xen_patch() does some special casing for
irq_ops functions to apply relocations when those functions can be
patched inline instead of calls.
Unfortunately none of the special case function replacements is small
enough to be patches inline, so the special case never ap
