On 12/05/2014 10:53 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
--- a/xen/include/xen/pci.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/pci.h
@@ -56,6 +56,8 @@ struct pci_dev {
u8 phantom_stride;
+int node; /* NUMA node */
I don't think we currently support node IDs wider than 8 bits.
I used an int because pxm_to_nod
>>> On 02.12.14 at 22:34, wrote:
> If ACPI provides PXM data for IO devices then dom0 will pass it to
> hypervisor during PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_add call. This information,
> however, is currently ignored.
>
> We should remember it (in the form of nodeID). We will also print it
> when user requests
On 12/03/2014 10:01 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 02/12/14 21:34, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
If ACPI provides PXM data for IO devices then dom0 will pass it to
hypervisor during PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_add call. This information,
however, is currently ignored.
We should remember it (in the form of nodeI
On 02/12/14 21:34, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> If ACPI provides PXM data for IO devices then dom0 will pass it to
> hypervisor during PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_add call. This information,
> however, is currently ignored.
>
> We should remember it (in the form of nodeID). We will also print it
> when user r
If ACPI provides PXM data for IO devices then dom0 will pass it to
hypervisor during PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_add call. This information,
however, is currently ignored.
We should remember it (in the form of nodeID). We will also print it
when user requests device information dump.
Signed-off-by: Bori
