Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] x86/HVM: don't inject #DB with error code

> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com] > Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 4:15 PM > > >>> On 03.12.15 at 08:46, wrote: > >> From: Jan Beulich > >> Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 1:38 AM > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich > > > > A simple

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] x86/HVM: don't inject #DB with error code

>>> On 03.12.15 at 09:38, wrote: > btw are you still requiring Intel review for whole this patch set? still > looking at 4/4 now... Iirc the whole series went in meanwhile. I.e. I wouldn't call it "require", but "nice to have" (ensuring you don't spot an issue with what

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] x86/HVM: don't inject #DB with error code

>>> On 03.12.15 at 08:46, wrote: >> From: Jan Beulich >> Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 1:38 AM >> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich > > A simple description why error code is not required is preferred here. Well, anyone knowing what #DB means should

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] x86/HVM: don't inject #DB with error code

> From: Jan Beulich > Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 1:38 AM > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich A simple description why error code is not required is preferred here. > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c > @@ -4133,7 +4133,7 @@ void

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] x86/HVM: don't inject #DB with error code

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c @@ -4133,7 +4133,7 @@ void hvm_task_switch( goto out; if ( (tss.trace & 1) && !exn_raised ) -hvm_inject_hw_exception(TRAP_debug, tss_sel & 0xfff8); +

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] x86/HVM: don't inject #DB with error code

On 10/11/15 17:38, Jan Beulich wrote: > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel