On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 09:50:10AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 01.06.16 at 17:35, wrote:
> > On 01/06/16 16:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> @@ -3440,42 +3440,24 @@ void hvm_cpuid(unsigned int input, unsig
> >> *eax = *ebx = *ecx = *edx = 0;
> >> break;
> >> }
>>> On 01.06.16 at 17:35, wrote:
> On 01/06/16 16:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> @@ -3440,42 +3440,24 @@ void hvm_cpuid(unsigned int input, unsig
>> *eax = *ebx = *ecx = *edx = 0;
>> break;
>> }
>> -/* EBX value of main leaf 0 depends on enabled xsave features
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 04:35:44PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 01/06/16 16:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > @@ -3440,42 +3440,24 @@ void hvm_cpuid(unsigned int input, unsig
> > *eax = *ebx = *ecx = *edx = 0;
> > break;
> > }
> > -/* EBX value of main leaf 0
On 01/06/16 16:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
> @@ -3440,42 +3440,24 @@ void hvm_cpuid(unsigned int input, unsig
> *eax = *ebx = *ecx = *edx = 0;
> break;
> }
> -/* EBX value of main leaf 0 depends on enabled xsave features */
> -if ( count == 0 && v->arch
Use hardware output instead, brining HVM behavior in line with PV one
in this regard.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
@@ -3362,7 +3362,7 @@ void hvm_cpuid(unsigned int input, unsig
switch ( input )
{
-unsigned int sub_leaf,
