On 24/08/17 18:12, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was expecting to be CCed on this patch.
Oops, sorry for that.
>
> On 21/08/17 19:05, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> The x86 and arm versions of XENMAPSPACE_grant_table handling are nearly
>> identical. Move the code into a function in grant_table.c
Hello,
I was expecting to be CCed on this patch.
On 21/08/17 19:05, Juergen Gross wrote:
The x86 and arm versions of XENMAPSPACE_grant_table handling are nearly
identical. Move the code into a function in grant_table.c and add an
architecture dependant hook to handle the differences.
This at o
>>> On 21.08.17 at 20:05, wrote:
> The x86 and arm versions of XENMAPSPACE_grant_table handling are nearly
> identical. Move the code into a function in grant_table.c and add an
> architecture dependant hook to handle the differences.
>
> This at once fixes a bug in the arm code which didn't unlo
The x86 and arm versions of XENMAPSPACE_grant_table handling are nearly
identical. Move the code into a function in grant_table.c and add an
architecture dependant hook to handle the differences.
This at once fixes a bug in the arm code which didn't unlock the grant
table in error case.
Signed-of
