[Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/5] flask/policy: comment out unused xenstore example

2016-05-23 Thread Daniel De Graaf
Signed-off-by: Daniel De Graaf --- tools/flask/policy/policy/access_vectors | 32 +++--- tools/flask/policy/policy/security_classes | 2 +- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/flask/policy/policy/access_vectors b/tools/flask/policy/po

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/5] flask/policy: comment out unused xenstore example

2016-06-07 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 11:05:33AM -0400, Daniel De Graaf wrote: > Signed-off-by: Daniel De Graaf Would it be good to include in the description something like: "You should be using the xenstore stubdomain".? Thanks. > --- > tools/flask/policy/policy/access_vectors | 32 > +++---

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/5] flask/policy: comment out unused xenstore example

2016-06-07 Thread Daniel De Graaf
On 06/07/2016 03:45 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 11:05:33AM -0400, Daniel De Graaf wrote: Signed-off-by: Daniel De Graaf Would it be good to include in the description something like: "You should be using the xenstore stubdomain".? Thanks. This is unrelated to

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/5] flask/policy: comment out unused xenstore example

2016-06-07 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 03:51:20PM -0400, Daniel De Graaf wrote: > On 06/07/2016 03:45 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > >On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 11:05:33AM -0400, Daniel De Graaf wrote: > >>Signed-off-by: Daniel De Graaf > > > >Would it be good to include in the description something like: > > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/5] flask/policy: comment out unused xenstore example

2016-06-07 Thread Daniel De Graaf
On 06/07/2016 04:02 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 03:51:20PM -0400, Daniel De Graaf wrote: On 06/07/2016 03:45 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 11:05:33AM -0400, Daniel De Graaf wrote: Signed-off-by: Daniel De Graaf Would it be good to incl