>>> Julien Grall 04/26/15 7:33 PM >>>
>On 26/04/2015 05:32, Wang, Wei W wrote:
>> Thanks for your comments. But I saw "int powernow_cpufreq_init(void);" is
>> put there.
>
>FWIW, this prototype doesn't have any implementation even on x86.
>
>While currently some drivers (such as the x86 powernow)
On 26/04/2015 01:33, Julien Grall wrote
Hi Julien,
> On 26/04/2015 05:32, Wang, Wei W wrote:
> > On 24/04/2015 20:57, Julien Grall wrote
> >> On 23/04/2016 18:58, Wei Wang wrote:
> >>> diff --git a/xen/include/acpi/cpufreq/processor_perf.h
> >>> b/xen/include/acpi/cpufreq/processor_perf.h
> >>> in
On 26/04/2015 05:32, Wang, Wei W wrote:
Hi Julien,
Hi Wei,
On 24/04/2015 20:57, Julien Grall wrote
On 23/04/2016 18:58, Wei Wang wrote:
diff --git a/xen/include/acpi/cpufreq/processor_perf.h
b/xen/include/acpi/cpufreq/processor_perf.h
index d8a1ba6..ebff11d 100644
--- a/xen/include/acpi/c
Hi Julien,
On 24/04/2015 20:57, Julien Grall wrote
> On 23/04/2016 18:58, Wei Wang wrote:
> > diff --git a/xen/include/acpi/cpufreq/processor_perf.h
> > b/xen/include/acpi/cpufreq/processor_perf.h
> > index d8a1ba6..ebff11d 100644
> > --- a/xen/include/acpi/cpufreq/processor_perf.h
> > +++ b/xen/i
Hi Wei,
On 23/04/2016 18:58, Wei Wang wrote:
diff --git a/xen/include/acpi/cpufreq/processor_perf.h
b/xen/include/acpi/cpufreq/processor_perf.h
index d8a1ba6..ebff11d 100644
--- a/xen/include/acpi/cpufreq/processor_perf.h
+++ b/xen/include/acpi/cpufreq/processor_perf.h
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
#defin
The intel_pstate driver is ported following its kernel code logic
(commit: 93f0822d).
In the kernel, a user can adjust the limits via sysfs
(limits.min_sysfs_pct/max_sysfs_pct). In Xen, the
policy->min_perf_pct/max_perf_pct acts as the transit station.
A user interacts with it via xenpm.
Signed-o
