Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] ARM: vPL011: use receive timeout interrupt

Hi, On 23 October 2017 at 21:31, Andre Przywara wrote: > Hi, > > On 18/10/17 17:32, Bhupinder Thakur wrote: >> Hi Andre, >> >> I verified this patch on qualcomm platform. It is working fine. >> >> On 18 October 2017 at 19:11, Andre Przywara wrote: >>> Instead of asserting the receive interrupt (

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] ARM: vPL011: use receive timeout interrupt

Hi Andre, On 24 October 2017 at 16:57, Andre Przywara wrote: > Hi, > > On 24/10/17 12:00, Julien Grall wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 23/10/2017 17:01, Andre Przywara wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 18/10/17 17:32, Bhupinder Thakur wrote: Hi Andre, I verified this patch on qualcomm platform. It

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] ARM: vPL011: use receive timeout interrupt

Hi, On 24/10/17 12:00, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi, > > On 23/10/2017 17:01, Andre Przywara wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 18/10/17 17:32, Bhupinder Thakur wrote: >>> Hi Andre, >>> >>> I verified this patch on qualcomm platform. It is working fine. >>> >>> On 18 October 2017 at 19:11, Andre Przywara >>> wr

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] ARM: vPL011: use receive timeout interrupt

Hi, On 23/10/2017 17:01, Andre Przywara wrote: Hi, On 18/10/17 17:32, Bhupinder Thakur wrote: Hi Andre, I verified this patch on qualcomm platform. It is working fine. On 18 October 2017 at 19:11, Andre Przywara wrote: Instead of asserting the receive interrupt (RXI) on the first character

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] ARM: vPL011: use receive timeout interrupt

Hi, On 18/10/17 17:32, Bhupinder Thakur wrote: > Hi Andre, > > I verified this patch on qualcomm platform. It is working fine. > > On 18 October 2017 at 19:11, Andre Przywara wrote: >> Instead of asserting the receive interrupt (RXI) on the first character >> in the FIFO, lets (ab)use the recei

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] ARM: vPL011: use receive timeout interrupt

Hi Andre, I verified this patch on qualcomm platform. It is working fine. On 18 October 2017 at 19:11, Andre Przywara wrote: > Instead of asserting the receive interrupt (RXI) on the first character > in the FIFO, lets (ab)use the receive timeout interrupt (RTI) for that > purpose. That seems to

[Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] ARM: vPL011: use receive timeout interrupt

Instead of asserting the receive interrupt (RXI) on the first character in the FIFO, lets (ab)use the receive timeout interrupt (RTI) for that purpose. That seems to be closer to the spec and what hardware does. Improve the readability of vpl011_data_avail() on the way. Signed-off-by: Andre Przywa