On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:49:41AM +, Thomas Leonard wrote:
[...]
> > Is libfdt required? I see inclusion of libfdt.h in arch/arm/mm.c but I
> > couldn't find trace to link libfdt in Makefile. And I ran a simple test
> > to compile minios in Xen tree on an arm board it doesn't compile.
> >
> >
On 30 January 2015 at 11:26, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 09:53:25AM +, Thomas Leonard wrote:
>> [ Cc += Anil ]
>>
>> On 25 January 2015 at 18:25, Wei Liu wrote:
>> > Cc Ian and Ian and some folks who might be interested in this work.
>> >
>> > On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 06:13:41PM +
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 09:53:25AM +, Thomas Leonard wrote:
> [ Cc += Anil ]
>
> On 25 January 2015 at 18:25, Wei Liu wrote:
> > Cc Ian and Ian and some folks who might be interested in this work.
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 06:13:41PM +, Wei Liu wrote:
> >> There has been increasing
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 02:19:23PM +, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
[...]
> >
>
> That makes reconciling some of these long running forks annoying,
> since they branched off xen.git. It doesn't matter if you split/fix
> in any order, but it's nice to have one changeset against xen.git that
> brea
Wei Liu, le Thu 29 Jan 2015 11:09:04 +, a écrit :
> In fact, stubdom should be treated as a downstream of mini-os as with
> any other unikernel. This can help us discover any dishonesty in API
> design and code.
Right :)
Samuel
___
Xen-devel mailin
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 01:18:02PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Wei Liu, le Sun 25 Jan 2015 18:13:41 +, a écrit :
> > There has been increasing use of mini-os in unikernel world and basically
> > everybody has their own fork of mini-os. That way going foward is going
> > to cause
On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 15:27 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] Split off mini-os to a separate
> tree"):
> > On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 14:48 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > libdft is its own project. I have no idea why we have a copy of it in
> > > xen.git. I think
Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] Split off mini-os to a separate
tree"):
> On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 14:48 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > libdft is its own project. I have no idea why we have a copy of it in
> > xen.git. I think this is wrong.
>
> This is for use by (i.e. linking into) the
On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 14:48 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > 2. xen/common/libfdt
> > 3. xen/include/xen/libfdt
>
> libdft is its own project. I have no idea why we have a copy of it in
> xen.git. I think this is wrong.
This is for use by (i.e. linking into) the Xen kernel, not the tools
etc. It's
Thomas Leonard writes ("Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] Split off mini-os to a separate
tree"):
> In case it's useful: for the standalone version of Mini-OS used by
> Mirage, I had to include these directories too:
>
> 1. xen/include/public
Official Xen policy is that OSs that want to run on Xen should take
On 27 Jan 2015, at 11:52, Wei Liu wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:57:57AM +, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
>> On 26 Jan 2015, at 09:53, Thomas Leonard wrote:
>>>
>>> [ Cc += Anil ]
>>>
>>> On 25 January 2015 at 18:25, Wei Liu wrote:
Cc Ian and Ian and some folks who might be interes
Hello,
Wei Liu, le Sun 25 Jan 2015 18:13:41 +, a écrit :
> There has been increasing use of mini-os in unikernel world and basically
> everybody has their own fork of mini-os. That way going foward is going
> to cause fragmentation of the community.
>
> We would like to split off mini-os tree
On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 11:52 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> Splitting should be done sooner in the release cycle rather than later
> IMHO.
I agree, it should be done very soon and we should avoid letting the
perfect be the enemy of taking the first step (to mix a few idoims).
> > What's the planned relea
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:57:57AM +, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
> On 26 Jan 2015, at 09:53, Thomas Leonard wrote:
> >
> > [ Cc += Anil ]
> >
> > On 25 January 2015 at 18:25, Wei Liu wrote:
> >> Cc Ian and Ian and some folks who might be interested in this work.
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jan 25, 201
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 06:42:11PM +0100, Martin Lucina wrote:
> tal...@gmail.com said:
> > In case it's useful: for the standalone version of Mini-OS used by
> > Mirage, I had to include these directories too:
> >
> > 1. xen/include/public
> > 2. xen/common/libfdt
> > 3. xen/include/xen/libfdt
>
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 09:53:25AM +, Thomas Leonard wrote:
> [ Cc += Anil ]
>
> On 25 January 2015 at 18:25, Wei Liu wrote:
> > Cc Ian and Ian and some folks who might be interested in this work.
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 06:13:41PM +, Wei Liu wrote:
> >> There has been increasing
On 26 Jan 2015, at 18:49, Thomas Leonard wrote:
>
> On 26 January 2015 at 17:56, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
>> On 26 Jan 2015, at 17:42, Martin Lucina wrote:
>>>
>>> tal...@gmail.com said:
In case it's useful: for the standalone version of Mini-OS used by
Mirage, I had to include these
On 26 January 2015 at 17:56, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
> On 26 Jan 2015, at 17:42, Martin Lucina wrote:
>>
>> tal...@gmail.com said:
>>> In case it's useful: for the standalone version of Mini-OS used by
>>> Mirage, I had to include these directories too:
>>>
>>> 1. xen/include/public
>>> 2. xen/c
On 26 Jan 2015, at 18:21, Martin Lucina wrote:
>
> a...@recoil.org said:
>> On 26 Jan 2015, at 17:42, Martin Lucina wrote:
>>>
>>> tal...@gmail.com said:
In case it's useful: for the standalone version of Mini-OS used by
Mirage, I had to include these directories too:
1. xe
a...@recoil.org said:
> On 26 Jan 2015, at 17:42, Martin Lucina wrote:
> >
> > tal...@gmail.com said:
> >> In case it's useful: for the standalone version of Mini-OS used by
> >> Mirage, I had to include these directories too:
> >>
> >> 1. xen/include/public
> >> 2. xen/common/libfdt
> >> 3. xen
On 26 Jan 2015, at 17:42, Martin Lucina wrote:
>
> tal...@gmail.com said:
>> In case it's useful: for the standalone version of Mini-OS used by
>> Mirage, I had to include these directories too:
>>
>> 1. xen/include/public
>> 2. xen/common/libfdt
>> 3. xen/include/xen/libfdt
>> 4. config
>>
>>
tal...@gmail.com said:
> In case it's useful: for the standalone version of Mini-OS used by
> Mirage, I had to include these directories too:
>
> 1. xen/include/public
> 2. xen/common/libfdt
> 3. xen/include/xen/libfdt
> 4. config
>
> ( https://github.com/talex5/xen/tree/minios-releases )
Ah, so
Wei Liu writes ("Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] Split off mini-os to a separate tree"):
> Cc Ian and Ian and some folks who might be interested in this work.
Thanks.
This is all good.
I think we need some changes to osstest too because we will want a
push gate for xen's minios. I don't think we want to ke
On 26 Jan 2015, at 09:53, Thomas Leonard wrote:
>
> [ Cc += Anil ]
>
> On 25 January 2015 at 18:25, Wei Liu wrote:
>> Cc Ian and Ian and some folks who might be interested in this work.
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 06:13:41PM +, Wei Liu wrote:
>>> There has been increasing use of mini-os
[ Cc += Anil ]
On 25 January 2015 at 18:25, Wei Liu wrote:
> Cc Ian and Ian and some folks who might be interested in this work.
>
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 06:13:41PM +, Wei Liu wrote:
>> There has been increasing use of mini-os in unikernel world and basically
>> everybody has their own for
Cc Ian and Ian and some folks who might be interested in this work.
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 06:13:41PM +, Wei Liu wrote:
> There has been increasing use of mini-os in unikernel world and basically
> everybody has their own fork of mini-os. That way going foward is going
> to cause fragmentatio
There has been increasing use of mini-os in unikernel world and basically
everybody has their own fork of mini-os. That way going foward is going
to cause fragmentation of the community.
We would like to split off mini-os tree so that everybody can upstream their
changes and work on a common code
27 matches
Mail list logo
