Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 31/35] arm : acpi map status override table to dom0

2015-02-11 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015, Julien Grall wrote: Hi Ian, On 05/02/2015 19:47, Ian Campbell wrote: On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 16:27 +0530, Parth Dixit wrote: +stao-header.length = sizeof(struct acpi_table_header) + 1; +stao-header.checksum = 0; +ACPI_MEMCPY(stao-header.oem_id,

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 31/35] arm : acpi map status override table to dom0

2015-02-11 Thread Julien Grall
Hi Ian, On 05/02/2015 19:47, Ian Campbell wrote: On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 16:27 +0530, Parth Dixit wrote: +stao-header.length = sizeof(struct acpi_table_header) + 1; +stao-header.checksum = 0; +ACPI_MEMCPY(stao-header.oem_id, LINARO, 6); +ACPI_MEMCPY(stao-header.oem_table_id,

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 31/35] arm : acpi map status override table to dom0

2015-02-06 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Fri, 6 Feb 2015, Julien Grall wrote: On 06/02/2015 01:39, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Thu, 5 Feb 2015, Julien Grall wrote: Hi Parth, On 05/02/2015 18:57, Parth Dixit wrote: On 5 February 2015 at 10:54, Julien Grall julien.gr...@linaro.org wrote: On 04/02/2015 14:02,

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 31/35] arm : acpi map status override table to dom0

2015-02-05 Thread Ian Campbell
On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 16:27 +0530, Parth Dixit wrote: +stao-header.length = sizeof(struct acpi_table_header) + 1; +stao-header.checksum = 0; +ACPI_MEMCPY(stao-header.oem_id, LINARO, 6); +ACPI_MEMCPY(stao-header.oem_table_id, RTSMVEV8, 8); I though the plan was to use

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 31/35] arm : acpi map status override table to dom0

2015-02-05 Thread Julien Grall
Hi Parth, On 05/02/2015 18:57, Parth Dixit wrote: On 5 February 2015 at 10:54, Julien Grall julien.gr...@linaro.org wrote: On 04/02/2015 14:02, parth.di...@linaro.org wrote: +stao-header.length = sizeof(struct acpi_table_header) + 1; +stao-header.checksum = 0; +

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 31/35] arm : acpi map status override table to dom0

2015-02-05 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, parth.di...@linaro.org wrote: From: Parth Dixit parth.di...@linaro.org hide UART used by xen by indicating it in STAO table and map it to dom0 Signed-off-by: Parth Dixit parth.di...@linaro.org Please check CODING_STYLE xen/arch/arm/arm64/acpi/arm-core.c | 50

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 31/35] arm : acpi map status override table to dom0

2015-02-05 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Thu, 5 Feb 2015, Julien Grall wrote: Hi Parth, On 05/02/2015 18:57, Parth Dixit wrote: On 5 February 2015 at 10:54, Julien Grall julien.gr...@linaro.org wrote: On 04/02/2015 14:02, parth.di...@linaro.org wrote: +stao-header.length = sizeof(struct acpi_table_header) + 1; +

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 31/35] arm : acpi map status override table to dom0

2015-02-05 Thread Parth Dixit
On 5 February 2015 at 10:54, Julien Grall julien.gr...@linaro.org wrote: Hi Parth, You don't only map the status override table. You also create it. I would update the commit title to reflect it. Sure, will take care in next patchset On 04/02/2015 14:02, parth.di...@linaro.org wrote: From:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 31/35] arm : acpi map status override table to dom0

2015-02-04 Thread Julien Grall
Hi Parth, You don't only map the status override table. You also create it. I would update the commit title to reflect it. On 04/02/2015 14:02, parth.di...@linaro.org wrote: From: Parth Dixit parth.di...@linaro.org hide UART used by xen by indicating it in STAO table and map it to dom0