Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 34/35] arm : acpi workarounds for firmware/linux dependencies

2015-02-10 Thread Julien Grall
Hi Jan, On 10/02/2015 18:01, Jan Beulich wrote: On 10.02.15 at 10:38, wrote: >> Why it's working on x86? This big allocation is done via the boot >> allocator memory (because the system state is early boot). Hopefully, we >> never have to resize it. >> >> On ARM64, ACPI is initialized after

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 34/35] arm : acpi workarounds for firmware/linux dependencies

2015-02-10 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 10.02.15 at 10:38, wrote: > Why it's working on x86? This big allocation is done via the boot > allocator memory (because the system state is early boot). Hopefully, we > never have to resize it. > > On ARM64, ACPI is initialized after the boot allocator has ended, so we > have to use x

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 34/35] arm : acpi workarounds for firmware/linux dependencies

2015-02-10 Thread Julien Grall
Hi Parth, On 05/02/2015 22:59, Julien Grall wrote: +#ifdef CONFIG_X86 #define is_xmalloc_memory(ptr) ((unsigned long)(ptr) & (PAGE_SIZE - 1)) +#else +#define is_xmalloc_memory(ptr) 1 +#endif Why? I though this was resolved? i am not aware what was the resolution on it? I didn't have acc

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 34/35] arm : acpi workarounds for firmware/linux dependencies

2015-02-06 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 06.02.15 at 15:38, wrote: > On Fri, 6 Feb 2015, Parth Dixit wrote: >> On 5 February 2015 at 23:18, Stefano Stabellini >> wrote: >> > On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, parth.di...@linaro.org wrote: >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86 >> >> #define is_xmalloc_memory(ptr) ((unsigned long)(ptr) & (PAGE_SIZE - 1)) >>

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 34/35] arm : acpi workarounds for firmware/linux dependencies

2015-02-06 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Fri, 6 Feb 2015, Parth Dixit wrote: > On 5 February 2015 at 23:18, Stefano Stabellini > wrote: > > On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, parth.di...@linaro.org wrote: > >> From: Parth Dixit > >> > >> Some bugs are identified in edk2 and some of the functionality is not > >> yet merged. This patch contains worka

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 34/35] arm : acpi workarounds for firmware/linux dependencies

2015-02-05 Thread Parth Dixit
On 5 February 2015 at 23:18, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, parth.di...@linaro.org wrote: >> From: Parth Dixit >> >> Some bugs are identified in edk2 and some of the functionality is not >> yet merged. This patch contains workarounds for them > > A patch with a few workarounds le

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 34/35] arm : acpi workarounds for firmware/linux dependencies

2015-02-05 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, parth.di...@linaro.org wrote: > From: Parth Dixit > > Some bugs are identified in edk2 and some of the functionality is not > yet merged. This patch contains workarounds for them A patch with a few workarounds left is OK, but you should explain exactly what they are and why y

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 34/35] arm : acpi workarounds for firmware/linux dependencies

2015-02-05 Thread Julien Grall
Hi Parth, On 05/02/2015 18:30, Parth Dixit wrote: On 5 February 2015 at 11:08, Julien Grall wrote: Hi Parth, On 04/02/2015 14:02, parth.di...@linaro.org wrote: From: Parth Dixit Some bugs are identified in edk2 and some of the functionality is not yet merged. This patch contains workaroun

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 34/35] arm : acpi workarounds for firmware/linux dependencies

2015-02-05 Thread Parth Dixit
On 5 February 2015 at 11:08, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Parth, > > On 04/02/2015 14:02, parth.di...@linaro.org wrote: >> >> From: Parth Dixit >> >> Some bugs are identified in edk2 and some of the functionality is not >> yet merged. This patch contains workarounds for them > > > While I understand

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 34/35] arm : acpi workarounds for firmware/linux dependencies

2015-02-04 Thread Julien Grall
Hi Parth, On 04/02/2015 14:02, parth.di...@linaro.org wrote: From: Parth Dixit Some bugs are identified in edk2 and some of the functionality is not yet merged. This patch contains workarounds for them While I understand some workaround (based on your cover letter), some of them is unclear

[Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 34/35] arm : acpi workarounds for firmware/linux dependencies

2015-02-04 Thread parth . dixit
From: Parth Dixit Some bugs are identified in edk2 and some of the functionality is not yet merged. This patch contains workarounds for them Signed-off-by: Parth Dixit --- xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c | 82 - xen/arch/arm/vgic.c | 16 +