On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 09:13:52AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 18.02.15 at 19:15, wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 02:14:20PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >> On 17/02/15 13:39, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 17.02.15 at 14:32, wrote:
> >> >> On 17/02/15 12:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >
>>> On 18.02.15 at 19:15, wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 02:14:20PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 17/02/15 13:39, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 17.02.15 at 14:32, wrote:
>> >> On 17/02/15 12:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >> On 14.02.15 at 00:21, wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:09
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 02:14:20PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 17/02/15 13:39, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 17.02.15 at 14:32, wrote:
> >> On 17/02/15 12:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 14.02.15 at 00:21, wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:09:39PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >
On 17/02/15 13:39, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.02.15 at 14:32, wrote:
>> On 17/02/15 12:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 14.02.15 at 00:21, wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:09:39PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> If I understand the problem correctly, I believe that the correct
> so
>>> On 17.02.15 at 14:32, wrote:
> On 17/02/15 12:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 14.02.15 at 00:21, wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:09:39PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
If I understand the problem correctly, I believe that the correct
solution would be to add a dmar_rmrr[ command
On 17/02/15 12:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 14.02.15 at 00:21, wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:09:39PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> If I understand the problem correctly, I believe that the correct
>>> solution would be to add a dmar_rmrr[ command line parameter along the
>>> same lines
>>> On 14.02.15 at 00:21, wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:09:39PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> If I understand the problem correctly, I believe that the correct
>> solution would be to add a dmar_rmrr[ command line parameter along the
>> same lines as ivrs_hpet[ and ivrs_ioapic[ which allows
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:09:39PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 13/02/15 18:52, Elena Ufimtseva wrote:
> > It appears from the experiments that some devices on few systems
> > may attempt to access memory ranges that are not RMRRs regions (and
> > are not reported by ACPI) and are reserved in t
On 13/02/15 18:52, Elena Ufimtseva wrote:
> It appears from the experiments that some devices on few systems
> may attempt to access memory ranges that are not RMRRs regions (and
> are not reported by ACPI) and are reserved in the host e820 map.
> These memory addresses appear to be the targets for
It appears from the experiments that some devices on few systems
may attempt to access memory ranges that are not RMRRs regions (and
are not reported by ACPI) and are reserved in the host e820 map.
These memory addresses appear to be the targets for DMA reads by
devices. Presumably, these devices m
10 matches
Mail list logo
