Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V2] libxl: relax readonly check introduced by XSA-142 fix

2015-11-16 Thread Ian Campbell
On Fri, 2015-11-13 at 09:56 -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote: > On 11/12/2015 07:40 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote: > > The fix for XSA-142 is quite a big hammer, rejecting readonly > > disk configuration even when the requested backend is known to > > support readonly. While it is true that qemu doesn't support > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V2] libxl: relax readonly check introduced by XSA-142 fix

2015-11-13 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Thu, 12 Nov 2015, Jim Fehlig wrote: > The fix for XSA-142 is quite a big hammer, rejecting readonly > disk configuration even when the requested backend is known to > support readonly. While it is true that qemu doesn't support > readonly for emulated IDE or AHCI disks > > $

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V2] libxl: relax readonly check introduced by XSA-142 fix

2015-11-13 Thread Jim Fehlig
On 11/12/2015 07:40 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote: > The fix for XSA-142 is quite a big hammer, rejecting readonly > disk configuration even when the requested backend is known to > support readonly. While it is true that qemu doesn't support > readonly for emulated IDE or AHCI disks > > $

[Xen-devel] [PATCH V2] libxl: relax readonly check introduced by XSA-142 fix

2015-11-12 Thread Jim Fehlig
The fix for XSA-142 is quite a big hammer, rejecting readonly disk configuration even when the requested backend is known to support readonly. While it is true that qemu doesn't support readonly for emulated IDE or AHCI disks $ /usr/lib/xen/bin/qemu-system-i386 \ -drive