> From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:andrew.coop...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Saturday, April 1, 2017 3:51 AM
>
> hvm_long_mode_enabled() tests for EFER.LMA, which is specifically different
> to
> EFER.LME.
>
> Rename it to match its behaviour, and have it strictly return a boolean value
> (although all its c
On 31/03/17 20:50, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> hvm_long_mode_enabled() tests for EFER.LMA, which is specifically different to
> EFER.LME.
>
> Rename it to match its behaviour, and have it strictly return a boolean value
> (although all its callers already use it in implicitly-boolean contexts, so no
>
>>> On 31.03.17 at 21:50, wrote:
> @@ -1154,13 +1154,13 @@ static void virtual_vmentry(struct cpu_user_regs
> *regs)
> /*
> * EFER handling:
> * hvm_set_efer won't work if CR0.PG = 1, so we change the value
> - * directly to make hvm_long_mode_enabled(v) work in L2.
> + *
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:andrew.coop...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 31 March 2017 20:51
> To: Xen-devel
> Cc: Andrew Cooper ; Jan Beulich
> ; Paul Durrant ; Tim
> (Xen.org) ; George Dunlap ; Jun
> Nakajima ; Kevin Tian ;
> Boris Ostrovsky ; Suravee Suthikulpanit
> ; Julie
hvm_long_mode_enabled() tests for EFER.LMA, which is specifically different to
EFER.LME.
Rename it to match its behaviour, and have it strictly return a boolean value
(although all its callers already use it in implicitly-boolean contexts, so no
functional change).
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
-
