David Vrabel writes:
> On 22/08/16 16:42, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> Small packet loss is reported on complex multi host network configurations
>> including tunnels, NAT, ... My investigation led me to the following check
>> in netback which drops packets:
>>
>> if (unlikely(txreq.size <
On 22/08/16 16:42, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Small packet loss is reported on complex multi host network configurations
> including tunnels, NAT, ... My investigation led me to the following check
> in netback which drops packets:
>
> if (unlikely(txreq.size < ETH_HLEN)) {
>
Vitaly Kuznetsov writes:
> Vitaly Kuznetsov writes:
>
>> David Vrabel writes:
>>
>>> On 22/08/16 16:42, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
I see two ways to fix the issue:
- Change the 'wire' protocol between netfront and netback to start keeping
the original SKB structure. We'll ha
Vitaly Kuznetsov writes:
> David Vrabel writes:
>
>> On 22/08/16 16:42, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>>>
>>> I see two ways to fix the issue:
>>> - Change the 'wire' protocol between netfront and netback to start keeping
>>> the original SKB structure. We'll have to add a flag indicating the fact
David Vrabel writes:
> On 22/08/16 16:42, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>>
>> I see two ways to fix the issue:
>> - Change the 'wire' protocol between netfront and netback to start keeping
>> the original SKB structure. We'll have to add a flag indicating the fact
>> that the particular request is
On 22/08/16 16:42, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>
> I see two ways to fix the issue:
> - Change the 'wire' protocol between netfront and netback to start keeping
> the original SKB structure. We'll have to add a flag indicating the fact
> that the particular request is a part of the original linear
Small packet loss is reported on complex multi host network configurations
including tunnels, NAT, ... My investigation led me to the following check
in netback which drops packets:
if (unlikely(txreq.size < ETH_HLEN)) {
netdev_err(queue->vif->dev,
