On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> On 10/12/2017 10:34 AM, Thomas Garnier wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Tom Lendacky
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/11/2017 3:30 PM, Thomas Garnier wrote:
Changes:
- patch v1:
- Simplify ftrace implementation
On 10/12/2017 10:34 AM, Thomas Garnier wrote:
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
On 10/11/2017 3:30 PM, Thomas Garnier wrote:
Changes:
- patch v1:
- Simplify ftrace implementation.
- Use gcc mstack-protector-guard-reg=%gs with PIE when possible.
- rfc v3:
On 2017.10.12 at 08:34 -0700, Thomas Garnier wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> > On 10/11/2017 3:30 PM, Thomas Garnier wrote:
> >> Changes:
> >> - patch v1:
> >> - Simplify ftrace implementation.
> >> - Use gcc mstack-protector-guard-reg=%gs with PIE when po
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> On 10/11/2017 3:30 PM, Thomas Garnier wrote:
>> Changes:
>> - patch v1:
>> - Simplify ftrace implementation.
>> - Use gcc mstack-protector-guard-reg=%gs with PIE when possible.
>> - rfc v3:
>> - Use --emit-relocs instead of -pi
On 10/11/2017 3:30 PM, Thomas Garnier wrote:
> Changes:
> - patch v1:
> - Simplify ftrace implementation.
> - Use gcc mstack-protector-guard-reg=%gs with PIE when possible.
> - rfc v3:
> - Use --emit-relocs instead of -pie to reduce dynamic relocation space on
> mapped memory.
Changes:
- patch v1:
- Simplify ftrace implementation.
- Use gcc mstack-protector-guard-reg=%gs with PIE when possible.
- rfc v3:
- Use --emit-relocs instead of -pie to reduce dynamic relocation space on
mapped memory. It also simplifies the relocation process.
- Move the start t