Acknowledging it formally...
Reviewed-by: Krish Sadhukhan
The review was based on Intel SDM chapters 24 and 30.
-Krish
On 03/16/2017 11:24 AM, Krish Sadhukhan wrote:
This one looks good to me.
-Krish
On 03/13/2017 03:51 AM, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
Intel SDM states that if the current VMCS is
This one looks good to me.
-Krish
On 03/13/2017 03:51 AM, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
Intel SDM states that if the current VMCS is a shadow VMCS,
VMFailInvalid occurs and control passes to the next instruction.
Implement such behaviour for nested vmlaunch.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Dyasli
---
xen/arc
> From: Sergey Dyasli [mailto:sergey.dya...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 6:52 PM
>
> Intel SDM states that if the current VMCS is a shadow VMCS, VMFailInvalid
> occurs and control passes to the next instruction.
>
> Implement such behaviour for nested vmlaunch.
>
> Signed-off-by: S
Intel SDM states that if the current VMCS is a shadow VMCS,
VMFailInvalid occurs and control passes to the next instruction.
Implement such behaviour for nested vmlaunch.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Dyasli
---
xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c | 7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/xen/
