On 17-04-10 11:27:04, Yi Sun wrote:
> On 17-04-07 03:46:42, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >>> On 07.04.17 at 11:08, wrote:
> > > On 17-04-07 02:48:40, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >> >>> On 07.04.17 at 07:17, wrote:
> > >> > On 17-04-06 08:02:15, Jan
On 17-04-07 03:46:42, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 07.04.17 at 11:08, wrote:
> > On 17-04-07 02:48:40, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 07.04.17 at 07:17, wrote:
> >> > On 17-04-06 08:02:15, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >> Okay, so not the context
>>> On 07.04.17 at 11:08, wrote:
> On 17-04-07 02:48:40, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 07.04.17 at 07:17, wrote:
>> > On 17-04-06 08:02:15, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >> Okay, so not the context switch path then, But you must be
>> >> changing the
On 17-04-07 02:48:40, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 07.04.17 at 07:17, wrote:
> > On 17-04-06 08:02:15, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> Okay, so not the context switch path then, But you must be
> >> changing the MSRs _somewhere_, and the question is why this
> >> somewhere isn't
>>> On 07.04.17 at 07:17, wrote:
> On 17-04-06 08:02:15, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Okay, so not the context switch path then, But you must be
>> changing the MSRs _somewhere_, and the question is why this
>> somewhere isn't sufficient.
>>
> Besides the restore behavior in
On 17-04-06 08:02:15, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 06.04.17 at 12:02, wrote:
> > On 17-04-06 03:34:27, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 06.04.17 at 11:22, wrote:
> >> > On 17-04-06 02:32:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >> >>> On 06.04.17 at 07:49,
On 17-04-06 03:34:27, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 06.04.17 at 11:22, wrote:
> > On 17-04-06 02:32:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 06.04.17 at 07:49, wrote:
> >> > On 17-04-05 09:10:58, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >> >>> On 01.04.17 at 15:53,
>>> On 06.04.17 at 11:22, wrote:
> On 17-04-06 02:32:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 06.04.17 at 07:49, wrote:
>> > On 17-04-05 09:10:58, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >> >>> On 01.04.17 at 15:53, wrote:
>> >> > +static void
On 17-04-06 02:32:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 06.04.17 at 07:49, wrote:
> > On 17-04-05 09:10:58, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 01.04.17 at 15:53, wrote:
> >> > +static void free_socket_resources(unsigned int socket)
> >> > +{
> >> > +
>>> On 06.04.17 at 07:49, wrote:
> On 17-04-05 09:10:58, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 01.04.17 at 15:53, wrote:
>> > +static void free_socket_resources(unsigned int socket)
>> > +{
>> > +unsigned int i;
>> > +struct psr_socket_info
On 17-04-05 09:10:58, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 01.04.17 at 15:53, wrote:
> > @@ -76,7 +79,7 @@ struct feat_node {
> > *
> > * Feature independent HW info and common values are also defined in
> > it.
> > */
> > -const struct feat_props {
> > +
>>> On 01.04.17 at 15:53, wrote:
> @@ -76,7 +79,7 @@ struct feat_node {
> *
> * Feature independent HW info and common values are also defined in it.
> */
> -const struct feat_props {
> +struct feat_props {
As said before, the const here should
This patch implements the CPU init and free flow including L3 CAT
initialization and some resources free. It includes below flows:
1. presmp init:
- parse command line parameter.
- allocate socket info for every socket.
- allocate feature resource.
- initialize socket info, get
13 matches
Mail list logo