On Fri, 2 Jun 2017, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 05/31/2017 07:49 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > I don't want to introduce any more hardcoding, I just would like the
> > > existing vgic_migrate_irq to be called.
> >
> > It is going to need a bit of rework to get it working with LPI as the
Hi,
On 05/31/2017 07:49 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
I don't want to introduce any more hardcoding, I just would like the
existing vgic_migrate_irq to be called.
It is going to need a bit of rework to get it working with LPI as the
code is currently gated with (p->desc). For what benefits?
Not
Hi Stefano,
On 31/05/2017 18:53, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Wed, 31 May 2017, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Stefano,
On 30/05/17 23:35, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
+/*
+ * TODO: lookup currently-in-guest virtual IRQs and migrate them,
+ * as the locking may be fragile otherwise.
+ *
On Wed, 31 May 2017, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> On 30/05/17 23:35, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > +/*
> > > + * TODO: lookup currently-in-guest virtual IRQs and migrate them,
> > > + * as the locking may be fragile otherwise.
> > > + * This is not easy to do at the
Hi Stefano,
On 30/05/17 23:35, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
+/*
+ * TODO: lookup currently-in-guest virtual IRQs and migrate them,
+ * as the locking may be fragile otherwise.
+ * This is not easy to do at the moment, but should become easier
+ * with the introduction of a
On Fri, 26 May 2017, Andre Przywara wrote:
> The MOVI command moves the interrupt affinity from one redistributor
> (read: VCPU) to another.
> For now migration of "live" LPIs is not yet implemented, but we store
> the changed affinity in our virtual ITTE and the pending_irq.
>
> Signed-off-by:
The MOVI command moves the interrupt affinity from one redistributor
(read: VCPU) to another.
For now migration of "live" LPIs is not yet implemented, but we store
the changed affinity in our virtual ITTE and the pending_irq.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara
---