Hi Stefano,
On 11/12/15 14:36, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Dec 2015, Julien Grall wrote:
>> On 04/12/2015 12:36, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> Injecting a fault to the guest just because it is writing to one of the
>>> GICD_ICACTIVER registers, which are part of the GICv2 and GICv3 specs
On Fri, 4 Dec 2015, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Stefano:
>
> Can you please add xen/arm in the commit title?
>
> On 04/12/2015 12:36, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Injecting a fault to the guest just because it is writing to one of the
> > GICD_ICACTIVER registers, which are part of the GICv2 and GI
Hi Stefano:
Can you please add xen/arm in the commit title?
On 04/12/2015 12:36, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Injecting a fault to the guest just because it is writing to one of the
GICD_ICACTIVER registers, which are part of the GICv2 and GICv3 specs,
is harsh. Additionally it causes recent linux
Injecting a fault to the guest just because it is writing to one of the
GICD_ICACTIVER registers, which are part of the GICv2 and GICv3 specs,
is harsh. Additionally it causes recent linux kernels to fail to boot on
Xen.
Ignore writes to GICD_ICACTIVER ... GICD_ICACTIVERN instead, to solve
the boo
