Hi,
On 11/22/2017 01:00 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 22.11.17 at 13:39, wrote:
See the code comment being added for why we need this.
This is being placed here to balance between the desire to prevent
future similar issues (the risk of which would grow if it was put
further
>>> On 22.11.17 at 13:39, wrote:
> See the code comment being added for why we need this.
>
> This is being placed here to balance between the desire to prevent
> future similar issues (the risk of which would grow if it was put
> further down the call stack, e.g. in
On 22/11/17 12:39, Jan Beulich wrote:
> See the code comment being added for why we need this.
>
> This is being placed here to balance between the desire to prevent
> future similar issues (the risk of which would grow if it was put
> further down the call stack, e.g. in vmx_vcpu_destroy()) and
See the code comment being added for why we need this.
This is being placed here to balance between the desire to prevent
future similar issues (the risk of which would grow if it was put
further down the call stack, e.g. in vmx_vcpu_destroy()) and the
intention to limit the performance impact